2006
DOI: 10.1080/13629380600803043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Societal risk perception among Egyptian adolescents and young adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have shown that risk ratings may substantially vary from one country to another. As an example, the level of risk associated with the item "Nuclear Power Plants" was rated 31 (out of 100) in a Hungarian sample (Englander et al 1986), 34 in a Swedish sample (Nyland 1993), 47 in a Norwegian sample (Teigen et al 1988), an Australian sample (Finucane and Maybery 1996), and a Finnish sample (Mullet et al 2004), 49 in a Polish sample (Goszcynska et al 1991), 62 in an Italian sample (Savadori et al 1998), 66 in a Macanese sample (Neto and Mullet 2001) and a Brazilian sample (Nyland 1993), 67 in a Portuguese sample (Neto and Mullet 1999), 68 in a Hong Kong sample (Keown 1989), 69 in a French sample (Karpowicz-Lazreg and Mullet 1993), 72 in a U.S. sample (Slovic et al 1985) and a Korean sample (Cha 2000), 76 in an Egyptian sample (Ahmed et al 2006), 78 in a Burkina Faso sample (Koné and Mullet 1994), and 84 in a Spanish sample (Muñoz Sastre et al 2006).…”
Section: Societal Risk Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have shown that risk ratings may substantially vary from one country to another. As an example, the level of risk associated with the item "Nuclear Power Plants" was rated 31 (out of 100) in a Hungarian sample (Englander et al 1986), 34 in a Swedish sample (Nyland 1993), 47 in a Norwegian sample (Teigen et al 1988), an Australian sample (Finucane and Maybery 1996), and a Finnish sample (Mullet et al 2004), 49 in a Polish sample (Goszcynska et al 1991), 62 in an Italian sample (Savadori et al 1998), 66 in a Macanese sample (Neto and Mullet 2001) and a Brazilian sample (Nyland 1993), 67 in a Portuguese sample (Neto and Mullet 1999), 68 in a Hong Kong sample (Keown 1989), 69 in a French sample (Karpowicz-Lazreg and Mullet 1993), 72 in a U.S. sample (Slovic et al 1985) and a Korean sample (Cha 2000), 76 in an Egyptian sample (Ahmed et al 2006), 78 in a Burkina Faso sample (Koné and Mullet 1994), and 84 in a Spanish sample (Muñoz Sastre et al 2006).…”
Section: Societal Risk Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was about the specific differences observed between the Kuwaiti ratings and the French ratings. In the study by Ahmed et al (2006) numerous important differences between Egyptians and French ratings were observed. These differences were concerned with items related to the following: health and medical care (e.g., food irradiation, alcoholic beverages, water fluoridation, homeopathic drugs); the environment (e.g., lead, solar power plants, nuclear waste storage, genetically engineered organisms); violence (e.g., police work, fire fighting, hunting); buildings (skyscrapers, tribunes in stadium); and several items related to common individual hazards (e.g., piercing, cosmetics, jogging, and sunbathing).…”
Section: Hypotheses and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The questionnaire used was the same as the one used in the study conducted in Egypt (Ahmed et al 2006). It was composed of 86 items taken from Slovic et al's (1985) risk questionnaire and 55 additional items borrowed from Bouyer et al (2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Societal risk perception studies have been realized in multiples countries in Africa (Ahmed, Macri & Mullet, 2006;Koné & Mullet, 1994), Asia (Neto & Mullet, 2001), in Europe (Bouyer, Bagdassarian, Chaabane & Mullet, 2001;Chauvin, Hermand & Mullet, 2007;Muñoz Sastres, Gatelier, Portell, Neto & Mullet, 2006;Neto and Mullet, 2000), Latin America (e.g., Nyland, 1993), and in Oceania (Finucane & Maybery, 1996;Rohrmann, 1994). In these studies, participants rated the overall severity of hazards (for example: weapons, drugs, ways of transportation, pesticides) on scales ranging from 0 (not at all risky) to 100 (extremely risky).…”
Section: Earlier Studies In Societal Risk Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%