‘Societal Relationships with Nature’: A framework for understanding nature‐related conflicts and multiple values

Abstract

In this paper, we operationalize the concept of Societal Relationships with Nature (SRN) as a framework for understanding nature‐related conflicts and multiple values. Based on three dimensions knowledgescape, interactions and identity, we propose a set of questions for the empirical analysis of conflict situations. We use two case studies—designation of a biosphere reserve in southern Chile and the return of the wolf in Germany—to illustrate how the SRN framework can reveal and structure the complexity of human–nature relationships. From the conceptual advances and the academic debate on multiple values of nature, we derive four requirements for approaches to analyse nature‐related conflicts and how different stakeholders attribute importance to nature. These should (a) cover the relevant aspects and reveal the critical issues underlying a conflict, (b) enable an understanding of differences and commonalities in people’s perspectives and positions, (c) be comprehensive enough to uncover important issues in complex situations without losing empirical practicability and (d) take power relations into account. We discuss whether and how the SRN framework meets these requirements. We present the SRN framework in particular to the academic community working at the interface with policy and practice on multiple values of nature and nature‐related conflicts. SRN analysis can also be applied to complement valuation approaches by specifying and explaining differences in people’s attributions of value to nature. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Untitled

“…Another option is to limit population growth. However, as our research proves, none of the above-mentioned ways of limiting consumption can be objectively used in the current conditions, forasmuch as their implementation requires the awareness of society that nature of the current interrelationship between a human and nature will lead to the death of all living things on the earth (Berghöfer et al, 2022).…”

International Conference Socioecos 2024

“…In this sense, `nature' is not something given, but is rather a result of the relations that exist among individuals, society and the physical world. Its various understandings and interpretations are underpinned by knowledge systems, cultural backgrounds, and languages (Berghöfer et al, 2022). Worldviews are metaphorical lenses through which individuals and social groups perceive, think about, interpret, inhabit and modify the world.…”

Solar parks as livestock enclosures can become key to linking energy, biodiversity and society

“…Especially the return of the grey wolf (Canis lupus) has led to controversy (Breyne et al, 2021;Dressel et al, 2015), and in Germany (Berghöfer et al, 2022;Jürgens et al, 2023;Gewolb, 2001; Figure 2), particularly in the 'post-traumatic' eastern Germany, rigorous wolf protection can be seen as an additional explanatory factor for emerging social dislocation (Pates & Leser, 2021).…”

“…In addition to the sprawl of solar parks, a second landscape‐level issue has caused a stir in the last decade: the return and spread of long‐absent large carnivores in Central Europe and elsewhere. Especially the return of the grey wolf ( Canis lupus ) has led to controversy (Breyne et al, 2021; Dressel et al, 2015), and in Germany (Berghöfer et al, 2022; Jürgens et al, 2023; Gewolb, 2001; Figure 2), particularly in the ‘post‐traumatic’ eastern Germany, rigorous wolf protection can be seen as an additional explanatory factor for emerging social dislocation (Pates & Leser, 2021). Parts of the former East German population developed feelings of disenfranchisement and detachment, especially in the face of their career experiences during the economic transformation (Pates & Leser, 2021).…”