2011
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.122754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socially-Responsive Gene Expression in MaleDrosophila melanogasterIs Influenced by the Sex of the Interacting Partner

Abstract: Behavior is influenced by an organism's genes and environment, including its interactions with same or opposite sex individuals. Drosophila melanogaster perform innate, yet socially modifiable, courtship behaviors that are sex specific and require rapid integration and response to multiple sensory cues. Furthermore, males must recognize and distinguish other males from female courtship objects. It is likely that perception, integration, and response to sex-specific cues is partially mediated by changes in gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(95 reference statements)
1
37
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim was to capture a broad sweep across the phenotypic expression of responses to conspecific rivals. Based on previous research by us and others, we chose the 2 h time point to capture initial gene expression responses prior to the expression of any phenotypic responses, 26 h as the point at which we know males have passed a threshold of significant phenotypic responses to rivals, and 50 h to capture any longer-term changes at a point where the phenotypic responses appear to have ceased (Carney 2007;Bretman et al 2009Bretman et al , 2010Ellis and Carney 2011;Fedorka et al 2011). An additional, important justification for these three time points was the need to avoid strong interactions with circadian effects on gene expression (by sampling cohorts of flies for gene expression analysis at the same absolute time of day, i.e., after 2 h, then 24 h later at 26 h of exposure, and finally a further 24 h later at 50 h of exposure).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The aim was to capture a broad sweep across the phenotypic expression of responses to conspecific rivals. Based on previous research by us and others, we chose the 2 h time point to capture initial gene expression responses prior to the expression of any phenotypic responses, 26 h as the point at which we know males have passed a threshold of significant phenotypic responses to rivals, and 50 h to capture any longer-term changes at a point where the phenotypic responses appear to have ceased (Carney 2007;Bretman et al 2009Bretman et al , 2010Ellis and Carney 2011;Fedorka et al 2011). An additional, important justification for these three time points was the need to avoid strong interactions with circadian effects on gene expression (by sampling cohorts of flies for gene expression analysis at the same absolute time of day, i.e., after 2 h, then 24 h later at 26 h of exposure, and finally a further 24 h later at 50 h of exposure).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of observable transcriptional changes in response to the social and sexual environment is supported by previous research. For example, short-term (<20 min) exposure of males to females or other males can alter the transcription of spermatogenesis and odor perception genes (Carney 2007;Ellis and Carney 2011). Males exposed to other males for up to 72 h also show differential expression (DE) in two of three seminal fluid protein genes (but not in four testis genes) tested (Fedorka et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These slight variations in timelines were required to keep mouse and stickleback experiments consistent with previously published protocols (8,43,67,68). The protocol for honey bee was novel, so we followed the stickleback timeline because expression differences for IEGs and other socially responsive genes are generally best detected 30 min poststimulus (69,70). We sampled three individuals per treatment for mouse and stickleback and six groups per treatment for honey bees.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this observation, one of the strongest LA cline outliers, egh, has been conclusively linked to strong effects on male courtship behavior using a variety of genetic techniques [79]. Additionally, gene knockouts of CG43759, another LA cline outlier locus, have strong effects on inter-male aggressive behavior [80], and may also contribute to behavioral differences between admixed individuals.…”
Section: Candidate Behavioral Reproductive Isolation Genesmentioning
confidence: 62%