2018
DOI: 10.1002/bse.2236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socially responsible supplier selection and sustainable supply chain development: A combined approach of total interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy analytic network process

Abstract: Socially responsible supplier selection and sustainable supply chain development involve extremely important decision‐making processes in supply chain management encompassing many quantitative and qualitative factors to consider. Given the vagueness of experts' opinions and the complex interrelationships among evaluation criteria, this study proposes and illustrates a hybrid model that combines total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) and fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) to determine the most appropr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our findings reveal that managers view economic and operational drivers as significant factors in implementing SSCM practices, some managers acknowledged that their companies have embraced SSCM to mitigate and manage business risk that relates to social and environmental supply chain activities (Table ). The findings indicated that the governance of risk is no longer simply perceived as an intraorganizational issue but rather a supply chain sustainability issue, which makes companies vulnerable to reputational risk (Golini, Moretto, Caniato, Caridi, & Kalchschmidt, ; Hajmohammad & Vachon, ; Hofmann et al, ; Mzembe, Lindgreen, Maon, & Vanhamme, ) and has a negative impact on performance (Buddress, ; Chen, Wang, Yao, Li, & Yang, ; Foerstl, Reuter, Hartmann, & Blome, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our findings reveal that managers view economic and operational drivers as significant factors in implementing SSCM practices, some managers acknowledged that their companies have embraced SSCM to mitigate and manage business risk that relates to social and environmental supply chain activities (Table ). The findings indicated that the governance of risk is no longer simply perceived as an intraorganizational issue but rather a supply chain sustainability issue, which makes companies vulnerable to reputational risk (Golini, Moretto, Caniato, Caridi, & Kalchschmidt, ; Hajmohammad & Vachon, ; Hofmann et al, ; Mzembe, Lindgreen, Maon, & Vanhamme, ) and has a negative impact on performance (Buddress, ; Chen, Wang, Yao, Li, & Yang, ; Foerstl, Reuter, Hartmann, & Blome, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies have explored the impact of environmental pressure on enterprises in the supply chain and have found that the proactive environmental strategies of enterprises can obtain trust in the supply chain [49]. On the one hand, green suppliers can restrict the pollution behavior of downstream enterprises through the assessment [50], reputation [51], and network mechanisms [52] of both sides and then require the purchaser enterprises to improve their environmental strategies. On the other hand, buyers can also exert pressure through collective boycotts or lawsuits to affect environmental strategies [53,54].…”
Section: Market Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To manage these tricky problems, some techniques have been used along with the AHP to minimize the associated uncertainty and the inconsistency, such as using the inter connections [25], frequency ratio [26][27][28], sensitivity and uncertainty analysis [29], interval calculations [24], modified analytical hierarchy process [30], weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical model [31]. However, many researchers integrate fuzzy theory with AHP to deal with the associated uncertainty within the comparisons [32][33][34][35][36][37]. The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is a more precise technique as compared to AHP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%