Philosophical Perspectives on Moral Certainty 2022
DOI: 10.4324/9781003178927-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socially Disruptive Technologies and Moral Certainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paradigm case of conceptual disruption in the philosophy of technology seems to be that of technologically induced conceptual disruption (Hopster et al, 2023;Löhr, 2023), often in conjunction with social disruption. To give two examples: the development of artificial wombs may challenge the concept of 'motherhood' (Frank et al, 2023;Hermann, 2023), and the development of sex robots with human-like cognitive capacities may challenge the concepts of 'sexual fidelity' and 'adultery' (Löhr, 2023). In either case, the new technology leaves us with normative uncertainty about how to apply terms whose meaning seemed unambiguous before.…”
Section: Disruption Change or Conceptual Engineering?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paradigm case of conceptual disruption in the philosophy of technology seems to be that of technologically induced conceptual disruption (Hopster et al, 2023;Löhr, 2023), often in conjunction with social disruption. To give two examples: the development of artificial wombs may challenge the concept of 'motherhood' (Frank et al, 2023;Hermann, 2023), and the development of sex robots with human-like cognitive capacities may challenge the concepts of 'sexual fidelity' and 'adultery' (Löhr, 2023). In either case, the new technology leaves us with normative uncertainty about how to apply terms whose meaning seemed unambiguous before.…”
Section: Disruption Change or Conceptual Engineering?mentioning
confidence: 99%