2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socially constructed or physiologically informed? Placing humans at the core of understanding cooling needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the UTCI provides an accurate reflection of the current weather conditions, thermal comfort or how individuals perceive those conditions, is a highly subjective experience that depends on individual physiology, acclimatization and culture 31 . Accordingly, heat–health studies have used various approaches to model heat stress.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the UTCI provides an accurate reflection of the current weather conditions, thermal comfort or how individuals perceive those conditions, is a highly subjective experience that depends on individual physiology, acclimatization and culture 31 . Accordingly, heat–health studies have used various approaches to model heat stress.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comfortable conditions are plotted in Figure 4b, which shows how comfort zones greatly differs from one household to another and how the PMV, in the figure always less than -0.5 and therefore indicating "slightly cool" to "cool" environment, cannot perfectly map the inhabitants' thermal sensations. These depend on factors that are not limited to temperature, humidity or the physical environmental parameters defined by the standards, but are also linked to the habits with which a person experiences his or her home [9]. Figure 5 shows the second limitation of OVS systems: the decreasing response rate over time.…”
Section: Ovs Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, people in different climates and geographies have also adapted and acclimatized to a range of temperatures beyond this upper end. The relativeness of human thermal comfort is also determined by people's physical, health, and socioeconomic characteristics (64). For example, vulnerable groups such as the elderly, children (65), pregnant women, or people affected by long-term health conditions such as obesity and diabetes, or those with occupational heat exposure, have higher vulnerability to heat stress (66,67).…”
Section: Cooling Behaviors and Cultural Approaches To Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%