Socially-assigned race and health: a scoping review with global implications for population health equity

Abstract

Self-identified race/ethnicity is largely used to identify, monitor, and examine racial/ethnic inequalities. A growing body of work underscores the need to consider multiple dimensions of racethe social construction of race as a function of appearance, societal interactions, institutional dynamics, stereotypes, and social norms. One such multidimensional measure is socially-assigned race, the perception of one's race by others, that may serve as the basis for differential or unfair treatment and subsequently lead to deleterious health outcomes. We conducted a scoping review to systematically appraise the socially-assigned race and health literature. A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, 28 EBSCO databases and 24 Proquest databases up to September 2019 was conducted and supplemented by a manual search of reference lists and grey literature. Quantitative and qualitative studies that examined socially-assigned race and health or health-related outcomes were considered for inclusion. Eighteen articles were included in the narrative synthesis. Self-rated health and mental health were among the most frequent outcomes studied. The majority of studies were conducted in the United States, with fewer studies conducted in New Zealand, Canada, and Latin America. While most studies demonstrate a positive association between social assignment as a disadvantaged racial or ethnic group and poorer health, some studies did not document an association. We describe key conceptual and methodological considerations that should be prioritized in future studies examining socially-assigned race and health. Socially-assigned race can provide additional insight into observed differential health outcomes among racial/ethnic groups in racialized societies based upon their lived experiences. Studies incorporating socially-assigned race warrants further investigation and may be leveraged to examine nuanced patterns of racial health advantage and disadvantage.

Race against death or starvation? COVID-19 and its impact on African populations

“…Collective cases on June 30 are projected to range about 2.9 million in Southern Africa, 2.8 million in Western Africa, and 1.2 million in Central Africa [60,61]. This variation in caseload and mortality might be due to lower levels of socioeconomic development and are likely to record less and slower transmissions at the early stages of the pandemic than higher levels of socio-economic development [62][63][64][65].…”

“…Health, social, economic, and political impacts of COVID-19 in Africa[13,41,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85] …”

Does race or ethnicity play a role in the origin, pathophysiology, and outcomes of preeclampsia? An expert review of the literature

“…The major limitation of the use of race and ethnicity in medical research is that race is a socially derived label that can either be self-reported or assigned. 13,14 The assignment of one's race or ethnicity is not rooted in scientific evidence to justify biological or genetic differences. Human population studies continue to find more genetic variations within racial groups than among them.…”

Tackling Diversity in Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials: A Report From the Diversity Working Group of the IRONMAN Registry

“… 7 These race and ethnicity groups are sociopolitical constructs. 8 They are not intended to define scientific or anthropologic classifications and do not encompass the diverse range of peoples. 9 Classification has been largely dependent on self-identification.…”