Comparative Social Evolution 2017
DOI: 10.1017/9781107338319.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociality in Bees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In CPF species, guarding the nest to deter predators and protect offspring is traded off against foraging. Adults may increase guarding time as by-product mutualism just by increasing proximity to other nests (Wcislo and Fewell, 2017). The time offspring are guarded increases with any temporal mismatch in visits by parents even in the absence of turn-taking.…”
Section: Sociality Buffers Against Biotic Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In CPF species, guarding the nest to deter predators and protect offspring is traded off against foraging. Adults may increase guarding time as by-product mutualism just by increasing proximity to other nests (Wcislo and Fewell, 2017). The time offspring are guarded increases with any temporal mismatch in visits by parents even in the absence of turn-taking.…”
Section: Sociality Buffers Against Biotic Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time offspring are guarded increases with any temporal mismatch in visits by parents even in the absence of turn-taking. Shared nest guarding might thus be one of the earliest benefits of sociality in species facing these constraints and may not require any specific trait besides an increase in tolerance among parents (Wcislo and Fewell, 2017).…”
Section: Sociality Buffers Against Biotic Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, despite their prominence in evolutionary biology, surprising little is known about the selective forces that have driven the great diversity of colony life-history strategies observed in social insects (Heinze, Kellner & Seal, 2017; Holldobler & Wilson, 1990; Hunt & Toth, 2017; Wcislo & Fewell, 2017). Certain ecological forces, like reduced foundress success due to harsh ecological conditions (e.g., intense competition) (Bartz & Holldobler, 1982; Bernasconi & Strassmann, 1999; Nonacs, 2001) or worker reproduction enabled by longer growth seasons (reviewed in Wcislo & Fewell, 2017) have been rigorously evaluated in the literature. Such studies have enhanced our understanding about the environmental forces that cause group formation in general and some aspects of colony life-history too (e.g., worker reproduction, cofoundress associations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies have enhanced our understanding about the environmental forces that cause group formation in general and some aspects of colony life-history too (e.g., worker reproduction, cofoundress associations). Yet, it is perennially noted that a broader conceptual or theoretical framework to organize the evolution of colony life histories in social insects is still missing (Bourke & Franks, 1995; Heinze et al, 2017; Wcislo & Fewell, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%