2020
DOI: 10.1680/jmapl.19.00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social value for whom, by whom and when? Managing stakeholder dynamics in a UK megaproject

Abstract: Ahead of Print articles will move to that issue's Table of Contents. When the article is published in a journal issue, the full reference should be cited in addition to the DOI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technological frames can even become absorbed by national institutions or policies, with policymakers themselves subscribing to frames about a given technology in ways that advance their status or align with the interests of their constituents (Kingdon, 1984). Frames can also become connected to particular problems a technology can solve (Oti-Sarpong and Leiringer, 2021), as well as the particular value propositions that the technology offers in addressing those problems (Mulholland et al, 2019;Mulholland et al, 2020).…”
Section: Conceptual Approach Of the Social Construction Of Technology...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological frames can even become absorbed by national institutions or policies, with policymakers themselves subscribing to frames about a given technology in ways that advance their status or align with the interests of their constituents (Kingdon, 1984). Frames can also become connected to particular problems a technology can solve (Oti-Sarpong and Leiringer, 2021), as well as the particular value propositions that the technology offers in addressing those problems (Mulholland et al, 2019;Mulholland et al, 2020).…”
Section: Conceptual Approach Of the Social Construction Of Technology...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the UK context, National Themes, Outcomes and Measures (TOMS) (National Social Value Portal, 2019) and Housing Associations' Charitable Trust (HACT) (in the construction sector) (UK Social Value bank, 2022) are two common frameworks for evaluating SV. Planning SV at the front-end of megaprojects consists of identifying the local community's needs for social services (Mulholland et al, 2020) and quantifying and documenting their financial benefits (National Social Value Portal, 2019). However, since the front-end is focused on the projects' financial aspects (Samset and Volden, 2016;Volden, 2019), transport megaprojects often fail to generate relevant SV (Motte et al, 2020).…”
Section: Social Value In Transport Megaprojectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the front-end is focused on the projects' financial aspects (Samset and Volden, 2016;Volden, 2019), transport megaprojects often fail to generate relevant SV (Motte et al, 2020). Also, measuring the outcomes of the SV plans is generally overlooked at the back-end of projects due to the qualitative nature of the SV (Glasson et al, 2021;Mulholland et al, 2019Mulholland et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Social Value In Transport Megaprojectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations