1979
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Validation: The Evolution of Standards of Competency for Target Behaviors

Abstract: The use of social validation procedures has become widespread in recent years. Although most researchers have used social validation procedures to select target behaviors and to evaluate whether the changes produced by a treatment program should be considered socially useful, little attention has been focused upon using the social validation process to determine the optimal levels for target behaviors. This paper suggests several ways in which social validation procedures can be employed in order to select whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
7

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
69
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Wolf (1978) stated that experimental procedures need to be socially validated in terms of significance of the goals, appropriateness of the procedures, and the importance of the effects. Van Houten (1979) proposed the inclusion of the social validation of standards of competency for target behaviors. In the present study, social validation took two forms: (a) evaluation of behavior change within the framework of normative peer data (standards of competency) and (b) feedback from individuals who had an interest or involvement in the experimental program (appropriateness and importance of the procedures).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wolf (1978) stated that experimental procedures need to be socially validated in terms of significance of the goals, appropriateness of the procedures, and the importance of the effects. Van Houten (1979) proposed the inclusion of the social validation of standards of competency for target behaviors. In the present study, social validation took two forms: (a) evaluation of behavior change within the framework of normative peer data (standards of competency) and (b) feedback from individuals who had an interest or involvement in the experimental program (appropriateness and importance of the procedures).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b) Secondly, a social comparison was conducted (Christensen, Young, & Merchant, 2004;Festinger, 1954;Houten, 1979;Szivos, 1991;Vuran & Sönmez, 2008). For this purpose, only the post-test design with control group, a pre-experimental model, was used (Büyüköztürk et al, 2012;Karasar, 2014).…”
Section: Social Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, only the post-test design with control group, a pre-experimental model, was used (Büyüköztürk et al, 2012;Karasar, 2014). Social comparison (SC) was implemented by comparing the target individual's performance to those of peers with typical development (Houten, 1979). In this study, in order to test for the validity of the intervention related to the outcomes for the children, students in the intervention group were compared to students who had characteristics similar to the intervention group (three students with special needs and three students without special needs) and who were from a school which was located in the same region as the intervention school.…”
Section: Social Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sosyal karşılaştırma, hedef bireyin performansı akranlarının performansları ile karşılaştırılarak yapılmakta (Van Houten, 1979) bu amaçla da karşılaştırma yapılacak bireylerin performans düzeylerinin belirlenmesi gerekmektedir (Christensen ve diğ., 2004;Van Houten, 1979). Bu çalışmada da müdahalenin çocuk çıktılarına ilişkin geçerliğini test etmek amacıyla, uygulama grubundaki öğrencilerle (özel gereksinimli çocuklar) karşılaştırma grubundaki öğrenciler (özel gereksinimli olan ve olmayan çocuklar) karşılaştırılmıştır.…”
Section: Sosyal Karşılaştırma Uygulama öRneğiunclassified