2013
DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2013.788480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social sustainability – society at the intersection of development and maintenance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
70
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
70
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the area of transport policy, for example, the social dimension now constitutes an important challenge all over the world [18], even though it still needs further simile [19]. Social impacts are, however, often hard to measure and quantify, not least since there is no single definition of social sustainability [19,20]. Social sustainability concerns places where people want to live and work, both today and in the future, and is closely related to well-being [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within the area of transport policy, for example, the social dimension now constitutes an important challenge all over the world [18], even though it still needs further simile [19]. Social impacts are, however, often hard to measure and quantify, not least since there is no single definition of social sustainability [19,20]. Social sustainability concerns places where people want to live and work, both today and in the future, and is closely related to well-being [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social impacts are, however, often hard to measure and quantify, not least since there is no single definition of social sustainability [19,20]. Social sustainability concerns places where people want to live and work, both today and in the future, and is closely related to well-being [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic quality or objectives consist of a different categories and factors: equity, participation, satisfaction, basic needs, social cohesion, income, well-being, social justice, employment, safety, and education. However, because of the absence of a coordinated applied system and a far-reaching meaning of the idea of social sustainability the thought stays ambiguous to some degree (Littigi & Griebler, 2005;Colantonio, 2009;Colantonia & Dixon, 2011, Jaeger et al, 2011Ahman, et al 2013;Weingaertner & Moberg, 2014). With this instance, green building assessment tool has been duly been affected with a single faced assessment tool developed aimed at attaining sustainable development in the building environment.…”
Section: Findings and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murphy (2012) employs four conceptual classifications of social criteria of sustainable development namely: equity, participation, awareness for sustainability and social cohesion that links social and environmental policy objectives. Ahman et al (2013), sees equity as the main concept of social sustainability, however, they categorized equity into several aspects (social cohesion, education, social capital, diversity, sense of place, quality of life and integration.…”
Section: Findings and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation