2013
DOI: 10.1080/16138171.2013.11687915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social sustainability of non-mega sport events in a global world1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
150
0
20

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
150
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the fields of the questionnaire concentrated on the perception of social aspects of the trail, according to previous studies that, on the one hand, affirm the role of this kind of sport tourism event in providing more social benefits than big events [45] and, on the other hand, suggest that small-scale sport events have fewer environmental impacts [37].…”
Section: Athletes' Social and Economic Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the fields of the questionnaire concentrated on the perception of social aspects of the trail, according to previous studies that, on the one hand, affirm the role of this kind of sport tourism event in providing more social benefits than big events [45] and, on the other hand, suggest that small-scale sport events have fewer environmental impacts [37].…”
Section: Athletes' Social and Economic Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-intended rhetoric about the social outcomes of 75 sport events are generally hoped for and desired, as opposed to being planned for (Chalip, 2006 AQ5 ), and much of the research is anecdotal (Smith, 2009). Taks (2013) contrasted and compared social impacts and outcomes of mega sport events and non-mega sport events using four different perspectives: power relations, urban regeneration, socialization, and human capital. Overall, non-mega sport events appear to provide opportunities for more positive (or less negative) social impacts and outcomes for host communities compared to mega sport events.…”
Section: Socials Impacts and Strategic Outcomes Of Non-mega Sport Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This example highlights the potential clashes among the different areas of event leverage and the importance of a community-centered approach to development (see, for example, Darnell & Hayhurst, 2011;Schulenkorf, 2012). Furthermore, it directly supports claims by Taks (2013) and Misener (2015) to prioritize local voices in the design and implementation of locally relevant leveraging strategies. We contend that this argument is particularly relevant for small-scale events where local communities are often both the source and the beneficiaries of event outcomes.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a large portion of the sport event leverage literature focuses on the outcomes of large-scale and mega-events, there has been a growing number of studies focused on maximizing the outcomes of smaller scale or community events (Schulenkorf & Edwards, 2012;Taks, 2013;Welty Peachey et al, 2015). Misener (2015) suggested that, in fact, smaller events have greater potential for leveraging social issues than do large-scale events or megaevents.…”
Section: Sport Events In Low-and Middle-income Countries 219mentioning
confidence: 99%