Social sustainability assessment of shale gas in the UK

Abstract

The majority of shale gas studies so far have focused on environmental impacts with few considering societal aspects. This paper presents a first and most comprehensive assessment of the social impacts of shale gas production and utilisation for electricity generation, focusing on the UK context. The assessment has been carried out based on 14 indicators, addressing the following social sustainability issues: employment, health and safety, nuisance, public perceptions, local communities, infrastructure and resources. Shale gas is compared to a range of other electricity options, including other fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Where appropriate and possible, the social impacts are evaluated on a life cycle basis. The results suggest that extraction and utilisation of shale gas would lead to a range of benefits, including employment opportunities and financial gains by local communities. However, these are limited and countered by a number of social barriers that need to be overcome, including low public support, noise, traffic, strain on infrastructure (e.g. wastewater treatment facilities), land use conflict and availability of regulatory resources. Furthermore, shale gas does not present a notable opportunity for increasing energy security, unless its production increases significantly above current predictions. These findings can be used by policy makers, operators and other shale gas stakeholders with an interest in the social impacts of shale gas development. The results can also be useful for other countries planning to exploit their shale gas reserves.

An MCDM framework for assessment of social sustainability indicators of the freight transport industry under uncertainty. A multi-company perspective

“…According to the World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), sustainable development can be defined as a growth that satisfies the need of present business without affecting future generations. SS is a vital component of the triple bottom line (TBL) (Elkington, 1998) and focuses on human wellbeing, human rights and freedom, workers' health and safety and community welfare (Cooper et al, 2018). Prakash Sethi (1975) defines SS in terms of social commitments and the task of cooperation.…”

The Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process in Combination with PESTEL-SWOT Analysis to Assess the Hydrocarbons Sector in Cyprus

“…Performance criteria and sustainable development pillars, i.e., social, economic and environmental have been used for renewable energy sources project evaluation [2]. Indicators have also be chosen to reflect specific conditions for social sustainability assessments of shale gas in the UK [21]. A tool that is used to measure or to rank the chosen sustainability indicators is the Multi-Criteria Analysis Method, AHP [22][23][24][25].…”

A social sustainability assessment model for manufacturing company based on S-LCA

“…At the same time, Sierra et al [3] also developed a deterministic method for estimating the social sustainability, this method can distinguish the contribution to social sustainability of different infrastructure projects and location contexts. cooper et al [4] focused on the uK context, proposed a first and most comprehensive social impacts assessment method of shale gas production and utilization for electricity generation. rafiaani et al [5] conducted a systemic approach considering the potential social impacts and three main stakeholders of local communities workers, and consumers were involved.…”