Social Support and Social Networks among LGBT Older Adults in Rural Southern Appalachia

Abstract

While research has begun to examine social networks and social support among LGBT older adults living in rural contexts, no research to date has examined these issues within the unique context of rural southern Appalachia. Thus, the purpose of this qualitative study was to extend this emerging area of research by exploring the perspectives of LGBT older adults on their social networks and social support while living in rural southern Appalachia. In this study, 11 LGBT-identifying older adults were interviewed regarding their social networks and social support within the cultural context of rural Southern Appalachia. Participants generally described having rich informal social support networks that seemed to buffer and mitigate the deleterious effects of the wider culture of homophobia and transphobia. These networks, while varying from person to person, included families of choice (spouse / partner, close friends), neighbors, pets, biological family / families of origin, religious and spiritual communities, women's or men's social groups, and current or former coworkers. While six of the participants voiced that their support system was adequate for their needs, there were reports of mixed, tenuous, or insufficient support systems for five participants. After reviewing main findings, implications for research, practice, and policy are discussed.

A qualitative study on pharmacy policies toward over-the-counter syringe sales in a rural epicenter of US drug-related epidemics

“…The social ties in rural areas, a salient feature of the social environment, have been found to be qualitatively different compared to metropolitan areas [ 15 , 30 , 46 ]. For example, the Pew Research Center found that 63% of rural residents surveyed reported living in their communities for eleven or more years, compared to 53% of suburban residents and 45% of urban residents [ 35 ].…”

“…While differences in the strength, connectedness and structure of social ties in rural areas have been observed previously [ 15 , 30 , 46 ], we seek to center this feature of the social environment. As reflected in the language of the participants, the opioid epidemic is a shared and repeated collective trauma [ 3 ] that has devastated these already vulnerable communities [ 42 ].…”

The Moderating Effect of Comfort from Companion Animals and Social Support on the Relationship between Microaggressions and Mental Health in LGBTQ+ Emerging Adults

“…More than 65% of LGBTQ+ adults report owning pets [43,44]. Several qualitative studies have investigated the impact of pet ownership among LGBTQ+ older adult samples and provide evidence that companion animals serve as sources of unconditional love, emotional comfort, and belongingness [45][46][47]. A quantitative study conducted by Muraco et al [48] found that pet-owning LGBTQ+ older adults reported significantly higher perceived social support than LGBTQ+ older adults without pets.…”

She came to me for care, why would I say no? Survey results of advanced practice nurses caring for transgender and gender diverse patients

“…In terms of descriptive location, related literature has demonstrated that rural areas tend to be more transphobic compared with urban areas. This is often attributed to rural areas being more likely to espouse socially conservative values compared with urban areas (Dakin et al, 2020; Lee & Quam, 2013; Renner et al, 2021). However, despite correlations in the literature between levels of transphobia and regional and descriptive locations, no such relationship was found in this study between regional or descriptive location of practice and provision of care to TGD people by the participants.…”