1994
DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90027-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social stress by repeated defeat: effects on social behaviour and emotionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings extend earlier observations in rodents exposed to social defeat stress and demonstrate that repeated confrontation with an aggressive dominant conspecific animal produced a marked loss of body weight [31]. These changes in body weight are in line with earlier findings showing a subsequent suppression of growth rate and even weight loss, which was unlikely to have been attributed to a reduction of food intake after several days after the social conflict [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our findings extend earlier observations in rodents exposed to social defeat stress and demonstrate that repeated confrontation with an aggressive dominant conspecific animal produced a marked loss of body weight [31]. These changes in body weight are in line with earlier findings showing a subsequent suppression of growth rate and even weight loss, which was unlikely to have been attributed to a reduction of food intake after several days after the social conflict [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With respect to the type of stressful social experience, a distinction can be made between those models in which the intruder is exposed only to "physical attack" and those in which it is exposed to both "physical attack" and the "threat of attack." Models that involve only physical attack may be differentiated in terms of (a) the length of confrontation [Haemisch and Gärtner, 1996], (b) the number of bites [Matsuda et al, 1996;Miller et al, 1987], (c) the amount of submissive behavior shown by the intruder [Albonetti and Farabollini, 1994], or (d) the duration of roll-tumble fights [Benjamin et al, 1993]. When both "physical attack" and "threat of attack" are involved, some models identify three phases (pre-attack, attack, and post-attack) [Tornatzky and Miczek, 1994], whereas others identify only two (pre-attack/attack and attack/post-attack) Martinez et al, 1998].…”
Section: Resident/intruder Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their aim is to determine the level of the domination and social status of each specimen in the group. Tests made for the purpose of the experiment described in this article were carried out on the basis of the Albonetti and Farabollini method [2]. This method discerns four types of behaviour: aggressive, defensive, ambivalent and neutral.…”
Section: Social Interaction Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%