Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high- and low-status groups

Oldmeadow, Julian A.; Fiske, Susan T.

doi:10.1177/1368430209355650

Cited by 84 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…High-power people see themselves (and are seen by others) as more competent than warm, whereas the reverse in true for low-power people (Oldmeadow & Fiske, 2010;Yzerbyt, Provost & Corneille, 2005). This is in line with studies…”

supporting

confidence: 89%

“…Previous research has shown that high-power people attach more value to competence than to warmth, while the reverse is true for low-power people (Oldmeadow & Fiske, 2010;Cambon, Yzerbyt & Yakimova, in press). This suggests that competence is the salient dimensions for high-power people, while warmth is the salient dimension for low-power people.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…What is important for the present research is that high-and low-power people differ in the relative value they attach to competence and warmth (Oldmeadow & Fiske, 2010;Cambon, Yzerbyt & Yakimova, in press). High-power people see themselves (and are seen by others) as more competent than warm, whereas the reverse in true for low-power people (Oldmeadow & Fiske, 2010;Yzerbyt, Provost & Corneille, 2005).…”

mentioning

confidence: 96%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Power of Projection for Powerless and Powerful People

Toma

Yzerbyt

Corneille

et al. 2017

Social Psychological and Personality Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Previous research suggests competing hypotheses regarding the effect of power on social projection. The current research proposes that this effect depends on the characteristics to be projected, namely warmth and competence. In four studies, participants first rated themselves on a list of traits/preferences, they then performed a power manipulation task, and, finally, they rated a target person on the same list. Studies 1 and 2 found that high-power participants projected less than low-power participants on characteristics related to warmth. Studies 3 and 4 revealed an interaction between power and dimensions of judgment such that low-power participants projected less than high-power participants on competence whereas the reverse was found on warmth. The underlying cognitive and motivational mechanisms are discussed. Previous research suggests competing hypotheses regarding the effect of power on social projection. The current research proposes that this effect depends on the characteristics to be projected, namely warmth and competence. In four studies, participants first rated themselves on a list of traits/preferences, they then performed a power manipulation task, and, finally, they rated a target person on the same list. Studies 1 and 2 found that high-power participants projected less than low-power participants on characteristics related to warmth. Studies 3 and 4 revealed an interaction between power and dimensions of judgment such that low-power participants projected less than high-power participants on competence whereas the reverse was found on warmth. The underlying cognitive and motivational mechanisms are discussed.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

mentioning

confidence: 96%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Power of Projection for Powerless and Powerful People

Toma

Yzerbyt

Corneille

et al. 2017

Social Psychological and Personality Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The second dimension relies on a person's ability to achieve objectives, succeed in a social system and obtain the most valued positions (Abele & Wojciszke, 2007;Darnon, et al 2009;Dubois & Beauvois, 2001, 2005Testé & Perrin, 2013). Research suggests that this second dimension is associated with high-status groups (Fiske et al, 2002;Fragale, Rosen, Xu, & Merideth, 2009;Oldmeadow & Fiske, 2010), and related to an individual's status (Carrier, Louvet, Chauvin, & Rohmer, 2014;Dubois, 2010).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

When Attribution of Consistency Depends on Group Value: Social Valorization of Preference for Consistency in Equivalent and Asymmetric Intergroup Relations

Sénémeaud¹,

Mange²,

Somat

2016

rips

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The social valorization of Preference For Consistency (PFC) was examined via a minimal group paradigm activating either equivalent or asymmetric intergroup relations. After an aesthetic judgment task and assignment to one of two groups, participants (N = 298) completed the PFC scale according to three instructions: on their own behalf, as an ingroup member, or as an outgroup member (order counter-balanced). Results showed that in equivalent intergroup relations, participants attributed greater PFC to the ingroup and to the self than to the outgroup. In asymmetric intergroup relations, participants attributed greater PFC to the high-status group and to the self than to the low-status group, and this was independent of the participants' group membership. We discuss the contribution the minimal group paradigm can make to revealing the social valorization of psychological constructs and the mechanisms underlying the social value accorded to PFC.

show abstract

“…Hence the sense of control that can be comforting and offers a safe environment. Besides, Oldmeadow and Fiske [16] have demonstrated that the internet use allows the reduction of the loneliness feeling [16,17].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Links between Attachment and Cyberaddiction

Menif¹,

Medini²,

Derouiche³

et al. 2016

JPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The growing importance of the new technologies raises the question of the relationship between the individual and the digital world. One of the main motivations of internet usage is social communication. Among the few studies concerning internet usage and the attachment, most suggest a predisposition of insecure people to the excessive internet usage. All participants completed two self-administered questionnaires: RSQ (relationship scale questionnaire) and IAT (internet addiction test). The self-administered questionnaires were put online: The link to the form was distributed by emails and social networks. Our results show a link between attachment anxiety and problematic internet usage. Internet could provide people having an attachment anxiety style a more reassuring environment to interact with others. The attachment preoccupation is a factor related to the problematic Internet usage. A management that takes into account the motivations related to attachment may reduce recourse to the virtual world.

show abstract

Social status and the pursuit of positive social identity: Systematic domains of intergroup differentiation and discrimination for high- and low-status groups

Cited by 84 publications

References 35 publications

The Power of Projection for Powerless and Powerful People

The Power of Projection for Powerless and Powerful People

When Attribution of Consistency Depends on Group Value: Social Valorization of Preference for Consistency in Equivalent and Asymmetric Intergroup Relations

The Links between Attachment and Cyberaddiction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About