1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1980.tb00857.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social status, activity and preputial glands of wild and domestic house mice

Abstract: Scrnt marking by deposition of urine, and the preputial glands, of adult, male, wild housr mire, ,\fus , n l l r c 7 l h L., were studied and compared with those of an outbred domestic \train. Thr preputial glands of dominant wild mice were always heavier than those of subordinate\. No dominance relationships could be established among the domestic mice. For study of scent marking each mouse was ohsened singly in a residential maze. Dominant wild mice marked mow than thr suboi-dinates. The domestic inice scent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(9 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, relatively larger males were predisposed to display more aggressive behaviours and less defensive actions. Although the correlation between the type of agonistic response displayed and differences in body size was marginally significant, the tendency observed was consistent with the general observation that body weight is an important element in defining competitive relationships among small mammals (Barnett et al. 1980; Hurst et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, relatively larger males were predisposed to display more aggressive behaviours and less defensive actions. Although the correlation between the type of agonistic response displayed and differences in body size was marginally significant, the tendency observed was consistent with the general observation that body weight is an important element in defining competitive relationships among small mammals (Barnett et al. 1980; Hurst et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We used matched-pair t-tests and parametric ANOVAs to examine the effects of status and sex on the derived PCA scores, all of which closely approximated normality, and Pearson correlations and matched-pair t-tests to examine the effect of size difference within dyads. All significance tests were two-tailed, since the two hypotheses often had opposing predictions, except for those concerning the effects of relative size; these tested the prediction that the heavier mouse would be more aggressive and less defensive than its lighter opponent, since the heavier animal usually dominates when M. domesticus (Barnett et al 1980;van Zegeren 1980) and many other rodent species (e.g. Grant 1970) meet on neutral ground.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wild house mice differ in growth, reproductive physiology, behaviour and others ways from the domestic varieties (e.g. Barnett, Dickson & Warth, 1980;Barnett & Munro, 1971;Barnett & Neil, 1972;Bellamy et al, 1973;Bronson, 1984;Plomin & Manosevitz, 1974;Wolfe & Barnett, 1977). Findings on wild types are more likely to have some bearing on what happens in free populations.…”
Section: Mb'i'hodologymentioning
confidence: 99%