Social Sciences: Truthful or Useful ?

Abstract

PreambleThe theme of this conference is the 'Unity of Science'. Let me explicitate how I interpret this interesting motto. For me this does not mean that there is one regina scientiarum that domineers over the other fields of science and learning; a role that was allotted to theology in the old times, and that nowadays -in a more secular vein -is claimed by physics at times. In my view the notion 'unity of science' rather refers to 'communality within diversity'. Disciplines vary in content, issues and methods. But there are also quite some common objectives, interests and concerns, the most important of which may be the common goal of searching for testable truth with objective and independent evidence. The communalities render it possible, or even imperative, to communicate and to cooperate. The diversity implies complementarity and calls for interdisciplinarity in the study of the many to-day's complex phenomena in science and society.

Psychology: Is It Applied Enough?

“…Let us take a closer look at the issue of truthfulness and usefulness, following an earlier handling of this theme (Drenth, 1996a). The distinction pure or basic science vs. applied science has been a major topic of discussion among science philosophers ever since Francis Bacon, in his book Novum Organon , asserted that science is only relevant if it aims at societal progress, practical application, and human control over nature.…”