Social science and Marxist humanism beyond collectivism in Socialist Romania

Abstract

This article brings together the history of the social sciences and the history of social thought in Socialist Romania. It is concerned with the development of ideas about the social beyond collectivism, especially about the relationship between individual and society under socialism, from the early 1960s to the end of the 1970s. The analysis speaks to three major themes in the current historiography of Cold War social science. First, the article investigates the role of disciplinary specialization in the advancement of new ideas about the social in the postwar period. Specifically, it asks how the debate over the relationship between sociology and Marxism-Leninism has challenged ideas about collectivism from Stalinist social science. Second, the article shows how social practice, individual and collective agency, and people's subjectivities became theoretically relevant in the 1960s, and how they were integrated, via empirical sociological research, into the reworked conceptual apparatus of post-Stalinist Marxism-Leninism. This complicates accounts about the role of quantification and theorization in postwar social science by foregrounding the intense reflection on the role of empirical research in sociology under state socialism. Third, the article shows how the relationship between individual and society became a topic of interest across social sciences in the 1960s and 1970s. The Marxist humanist approach to the social, although it never achieved the institutional status of a distinct discipline, adds an important perspective from East Central Europe to the existing historiography of the ‘thinning’ of the social in social sciences and social thought beginning in the 1950s.

Karl Marx's theory of human nature and its significance in educating people nowadays

“…"Men can be distinguished from animals by consciousness, religion, or anything else you like. They begin to distinguish themselves from animals as soon as they begin to produce their means of subsistence, a step which their physical organization conditions" [11]. In this passage from The German Ideology, Marx alludes to one difference: human produce their physical environments.…”

“…That is the second signaling system due to systematic tool-making and the emergence of abstract languages. In addition, through labor, human consciousness is growing and getting smarter [11].…”

“…Human nature is the total of historical-social relations. These particular relationships shape the manifestation of human nature [11].…”

Digital Communication Pathways of Marxist Theory Education in Colleges and Universities in the Context of the Internet

“…Paternotte, D and Verloo, M believe that there is a wave of de-democratization in Europe at the present time, and take the Social Complexity Theory, explored the dynamic relationship between cognitive configurations and antiscience, and found that people who accept Marxist theory of thought believe in the truth more, which provides a basis for the dissemination of Marxist theory in the West [12]. Hncu, A explored the relationship between sociology and Marxism-Leninism, and argued that the quantification and theorization of social sciences in the post-Cold War period became complicated, mainly because the role of empirical sociological research under National Socialism was able to provoke strong reflection [13].…”

A Study of Digital Communication Paths in Contemporary Politics and Marxist Thought

“…Hncu, A. et al combined the history of social sciences and the history of social thought in socialist Romania to investigate the relationship between sociology and Marxist-Leninist ideology, and the history of social science and social ideology. Stalin's social sciences were characterized by collectivist views and a conflict between sociological and Marxist-Leninist ideological debates [13]. Pike, K. et al illustrate how Eric Hobsbawm's political ideas and perspectives can lead to a better role for the Labor Party as a liberal democracy when viewed from a Marxist perspective [14].…”