Social roles and performance of social-ecological systems: evidence from behavioral lab experiments

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Social roles are thought to play an important role in determining the capacity for collective action in a community regarding the use of shared resources. Here we report on the results of a study using a behavioral experimental approach regarding the relationship between social roles and the performance of social-ecological systems. The computer-based irrigation experiment that was the basis of this study mimics the decisions faced by farmers in small-scale irrigation systems. In each of 20 rounds, which are analogous to growing seasons, participants face a two-stage commons dilemma. First they must decide how much to invest in the public infrastructure, e.g., canals and water diversion structures. Second, they must decide how much to extract from the water made available by that public infrastructure. Each round begins with a 60-second communication period before the players make their investment and extraction decisions. By analyzing the chat messages exchanged among participants during the communication stage of the experiment, we coded up to three roles per participant using the scheme of seven roles known to be important in the literature: leader, knowledge generator, connector, follower, moralist, enforcer, and observer. Our study supports the importance of certain social roles (e.g., connector) previously highlighted by several case study analyses. However, using qualitative comparative analysis we found that none of the individual roles was sufficient for groups to succeed, i.e., to reach a certain level of group production. Instead, we found that a combination of at least five roles was necessary for success. In addition, in the context of upstream-downstream asymmetry, we observed a pattern in which social roles assumed by participants tended to differ by their positions. Although our work generated some interesting insights, further research is needed to determine how robust our findings are to different action situations, such as biophysical context, social network, and resource uncertainty.

Ecological interdependencies and resource competition: The role of information and communication in promoting effective collaboration in complex management situations

“…To explore the actual content of the conversations we use an adapted analytical approach to that was first presented by Pavitt [45] and used in other resource-experimental studies [46,47]. This approach requires that after completion of the experiments, the transcripts of the group-chat conversations were downloaded and each independent message sent by a participant was separated into independent individual message units.…”

Empathy, place and identity interactions for sustainability

“…Research using games, experiments and social simulations shows that the ability to enact cooperative action depends on trust in groups and perceptions of belongingness (Perez et al 2015). Interactive games use new insights from behavioural economics and social psychology to analyze how place attachments and identities foster or constrain the ability of individuals to feel and act on empathy with others and the non-human world.…”

Addressing Social Dilemmas With Mascots, Information, and Graphics

“…Several studies have investigated how heterogeneity among decision‐makers and across space affects decisions in NPS pollution experiments (Spraggon ; Suter, Vossler, and Poe ; Wu, Palm‐Forster, and Messer ) and in other collective action settings (Janssen ; Perez et al ; Pérez and Janssen ; Tisdell, Ward, and Capon ). Although we used a spatially explicit hydrological model for this experiment, we did not design the experiment to analyze the impact of spatial heterogeneity on pollution abatement.…”