1982
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420120302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social representations, social attribution and social identity: The intergroup images of ‘public’ and ‘comprehensive’ schoolboys

Abstract: Investigated the relationship between social representations, intergroup causal attributions and the search for a positive social identity in two rival groups fromResults are discussed in terms of the influence of social representations on both causal attributions and intergroup differentiation; the existence of intergroup biases in achievement attributions; and the different modes of differentiation chosen by the different status groups. Social Identity Theory is seen as a valuable framework with which to con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
4

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Battistich, Solomon, Kim, Watson, and Schaps (1995) found relations between elementary school students' sense of community and their academic attitudes and motives, social and personal attitudes, motives and behaviour, and academic achievement. Hewstone, Jaspars, and Lalljee (1982) reported effects on students' attribution style and identity. According to Battistich et al (1995, p. 629) differences between these approaches are partly methodological and partly conceptual-the methodological issue pertaining to the focus of measurement: the group or the individual.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Battistich, Solomon, Kim, Watson, and Schaps (1995) found relations between elementary school students' sense of community and their academic attitudes and motives, social and personal attitudes, motives and behaviour, and academic achievement. Hewstone, Jaspars, and Lalljee (1982) reported effects on students' attribution style and identity. According to Battistich et al (1995, p. 629) differences between these approaches are partly methodological and partly conceptual-the methodological issue pertaining to the focus of measurement: the group or the individual.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The very concept of 'dispositional property' has been misunderstood to mean an individual personality disposition instead of all types of causal invariance, Social category memberships have been considered as factors leading to external attributions (e.g. Jones & McGillis, 1976) and in more recent work as social influences on the attribution process (Hewstone & Jaspars, 1982; Hewstone, Jaspars & Lalljee, 1982). The additional point being argued here is that social category memberships are not only background social contextual influences upon the attribution process but are themselves a special kind of attribution, a cognitive representation of a distinct type of social dispositional property.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These search (statistically) for groups of similar ratings or answers. So Group A might show common attitudes, beliefs, and attributions, which are consistent and coherent within Group A, while Group B shows another typical pattern which is consistent and coherent within Group B but not with those of Group A (e.g., Echabe & Rovira, 1989;Hewstone, Jaspars & Lalljee, 1982). This is important work, and I am not suggesting that it should stop.…”
Section: Social Representation Theorymentioning
confidence: 92%