2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0952836904005382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social rank in female reindeer (Rangifer tarandus): effects of body mass, antler size and age

Abstract: In polygynous mammals, fitness differences may reflect differences in phenotypic quality as well as experience. This study determines dominance hierarchy among female reindeer Rangifer tarandus from two experimental herds (consisting of c. 45 animals in each) during 2 consecutive years. The influence of body mass, antler size and age on social rank in the herds was investigated, first using simple regression analysis. The combined effect of body mass, age and antler size on female rank was further assessed usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is currently no evidence that male mate choice is that important in red deer or reindeer. Even though we did not use maternal dominance directly (as on Rum), dominance is highly correlated with female age and mass in our population (Holand et al 2004), suggesting that this is not due to traits measured. The lack of support for the TWM in our case may come from the fact that the herd is artificially fed during winter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, there is currently no evidence that male mate choice is that important in red deer or reindeer. Even though we did not use maternal dominance directly (as on Rum), dominance is highly correlated with female age and mass in our population (Holand et al 2004), suggesting that this is not due to traits measured. The lack of support for the TWM in our case may come from the fact that the herd is artificially fed during winter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…That the relative allocation of resource towards antler growth (in comparison to body growth as measured by the RAL) is higher at high density suggests a real investment into antler, leading us to argue that antlers are important for both male and female calves. Longer antler is reflected in higher social rank in this population (see Holand et al 2004), beneficial in both intrasexual and intersexual competition. The effect of early summer weather variables on RAL could partially be attributed to variation in forage quality and quantity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Antlers presumably provide a selective advantage for female reindeer in intraspecific competition, primarily during foraging, and especially during winter (Skogland 1989), allowing them to have higher dominance status (Holand et al 2004) than antlerless males during winter and spring. Indeed, males shed their antlers after the rut in October when they use their antlers in competition for mates, whereas reproductive females shed their antlers around calving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller group sizes would allow bulls to utilize smaller patches and exert less grazing pressure within an area. Cows, which retain their antlers over the winter, would also have a competitive advantage in maintaining and/or usurp¬ ing optimal foraging locations and feeding craters (see Holand et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%