“…Societal factors as specified in social identity theory (Rubin & Hewstone, 2004)—a social reality consisting of societal norms and values—and structural factors in the supply of politics (Klandermans, 2004) or political opportunity structure (Koopmans, 1999) together provide a more encompassing framework of factors spurring collective action. Along the same lines, we think that our conceptualization of social creativity can be considered a social psychological dimension in societal phenomena such as persistent inequality, which we outlined at the start of this article, or political inaction (see Klandermans & Van Stekelenburg, 2014; Stroebe et al., 2019; Van Bezouw et al., 2019). Additionally, previous research has shown that social creativity plays a role in classroom settings (Boen & Vanbeselaere, 2001), organizations (Elsbach & Kramer, 1996), and sports (Doyle et al., 2017; Jones, 2017); all of which can serve as important contexts in which to examine how the different roles that social creativity can play in bolstering social stability relate to real‐life outcomes.…”