Social, Psychological, and Behavioral Responses to a Nuclear Detonation in a US City: Implications for Health Care Planning and Delivery

Abstract

<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>A nuclear detonation in a US city would have profound psychological, social, and behavioral effects. This article reviews the scientific literature on human responses to radiation incidents and disasters in general, and examines potential behavioral health care provider (BHCP) contributions in the hours and days after a nuclear detonation. In the area directly affected by the blast, the immediate overarching goal of BHCP interventions is the support of lifesaving activities and the prevention of additional casualties from fallout. These interventions include 6 broad categories: promoting appropriate protective actions, discouraging dangerous behaviors, managing patient/survivor flow to facilitate the best use of scarce resources, supporting first responders, assisting with triage, and delivering palliative care when appropriate. At more distant sites, BHCP should work with medical providers to support hospitalized survivors of the detonation. Recommendations are also made on BHCP interventions later in the response phase and during recovery.</jats:p><jats:p>(<jats:italic>Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness</jats:italic>. 2011;5:S54-S64)</jats:p>

The Challenge of Allocating Scarce Medical Resources during a Disaster in a Low Income Country: A Case Study from the 2010 Haitian Earthquake

“…Studies of emergency responders show that they have a powerful sense of duty and deep commitment to help. 4 Despite adequate pre-disaster training, dysfunctional behavior can occur when responders are vastly overwhelmed and severely under-resourced. Additionally, dysfunction occurs when there are threats to personal safety and limited information about what is happening globally.…”

Developing a Practical Algorithm for a Pediatric Emergency Department’s Response to Radiological Dispersal Device Events

“…Radiation is widely perceived to be among the most dreaded hazards for reasons that include the inability to detect its presence via human senses, the increased long-term risk of cancer, the risk to children and fetuses, and the potential for genetic damage. 11 In the aftermath of an RDD event, the media may play an unintentional role in heightening anxiety by reporting the symptoms of ARS and information on the ability of radiation to penetrate buildings and travel long distances. 12 The severity and negative health effects are likely to be overstated.…”

“…13 Some of those presenting manifested physical symptoms of radiation exposure despite not having been exposed. 11 The likelihood of a large influx of fearful but physiologically uninjured people and the potential for psychosomatically induced symptoms in unexposed persons make efficient, accurate triage a high priority.…”

Scarce Resources for Nuclear Detonation: Project Overview and Challenges

“…The resulting articles in this special issue of Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness are not intended to be exhaustive reviews, and they reflect the judgment and opinion of the experts, not those of the governmental agencies or academic institutions that employ them. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The recommendations are based on the available data, recognizing that the human and animal data on radiation injury alone and on combined injury are limited.…”

“…The resulting articles in this special issue of Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness are not intended to be exhaustive reviews, and they reflect the judgment and opinion of the experts, not those of the governmental agencies or academic institutions that employ them. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The recommendations are based on the available data, recognizing that the human and animal data on radiation injury alone and on combined injury are limited.Model output for casualty types and number are described in a general manner. 15 (The Department of Health and Human Services has detailed models from which the data and guidance in these articles are based for the consequences of nuclear detonation in a range of cities, from a variety of heights of burst, and under a range of meteorological conditions, and for scarcity of specific resources for medical management of acute radiation syndrome.…”