Social presence in online learning communities: the role of personal profiles

Abstract

Online communication is increasingly used in education, but it is not without problems. One significant difficulty is a lack of social presence. Social presence relates to the need for users of technology-based communication to perceive each other as real people. Low social presence can be a particular issue in text-based, asynchronous systems such as discussion forums, leading to feelings of impersonality and disengagement from online learning. Features of online communication systems have the potential to increase social presence. One possibility, advocated in the literature on online learning, is the use of personal profiles and photos to help participants to learn something about each other and feel more connected. This paper discusses the question: To what extent do personal profiles enhance social presence in online learning communities? It presents research findings from two studies which investigated learners’ use and perceptions of personal profiles in online forums. The findings suggest that personal profiles and photos help some online learners to feel in touch with each other. Other learners, however, do not feel the need for these facilities, have privacy concerns or prefer to focus on the forum postings.Keywords: personal profile; online community; learning community; social presence; distance learning(Published: 7 August 2014)Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2014, 22: 19710 -http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.19710

The interrelationship of emotion and cognition when students undertake collaborative group work online: An interdisciplinary approach

“…Alongside the convenience and flexibility that online discussion forums offer to students there are some pedagogical benefits; there is time to reflect, to adapt practice, and to compose a response (Poole, 2000). However some students become frustrated with the inherent response delay when participants are not simultaneously present (Haythornthwaite, Kazmer, Robins & Shoemaker 2000;Kear, 2010;Sproull & Kiesler, 1991).…”

“…There are reports that learners find 'online environments impersonal, resulting in low levels of engagement and participation, and hence less effective learning' (Kear, 2010, p1). Several problems that impact negatively on the socio-emotional experience of learning collaboratively were articulated by ten students who were interviewed after undertaking a course that involved using online text based forums; the tone of some messages, messages that could easily be misconstrued, students who dominated forums, and a lack of information about peer students (Kear, 2010). There are some distinctions that can be made between the two modes, face-to-face and online (asynchronous) that are relevant for these findings.…”

“…Alongside the convenience and flexibility that online discussion forums offer to students there are some pedagogical benefits; there is time to reflect, to adapt practice, and to compose a response (Poole, 2000). However some students become frustrated with the inherent response delay when participants are not simultaneously present (Haythornthwaite, Kazmer, Robins & Shoemaker 2000;Kear, 2010;Sproull & Kiesler, 1991).The interrelationship of emotion and cognition when students undertake collaborative group work online: an interdisciplinary approach. 5 3.3 Frustration with group work, online and face-to-face Frustration is a unifying feature of many of the student accounts reviewed in the previous section.…”

Knowing My Peers: Edentity – To Invite Peer Interaction and Social Learning

“…Student profiles are discussed by for example Kear [1] as a mean to enhance the sense of presence (i.e. the extent to which the users perceive each other as real [14]).…”

“…A challenge that has emerged related to DLSs is that the students to a greater extent are feeling alone and isolated [1]. Learning is as such a social activity, which takes place in-between people [2], thus loneliness and isolation do not promote learning.…”