Social prescribing for individuals with mental health problems: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers experienced by general practitioners

Abstract

Background There is growing evidence for the use of social prescribing as a means to improve the mental health of patients. However, there are gaps in understanding the barriers and enablers faced by General Practitioners (GPs) when engaging in social prescribing for patients with mental health problems. Methods This study uses a qualitative approach involving one-to-one interviews with GPs from across the UK. The COM-B model was used to elucidate barriers and enablers, and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and a Behaviour Change Theory and Techniques tool was used to identify interventions that could address these. Results GPs recognised the utility of social prescribing in addressing the high levels of psychosocial need they saw in their patient population, and expressed the need to de-medicalise certain patient problems. GPs were driven by a desire to help patients, and so they benefited from regular positive feedback to reinforce the value of their social prescribing referrals. They also discussed the importance of developing more robust evidence on social prescribing, but acknowledged the challenges of conducting rigorous research in community settings. GPs lacked the capacity, and formal training, to effectively engage with community groups for patients with mental health problems. Link workers, when available to GPs, were of fundamental importance in bridging the gap between the GP and community. The formation of trusting relationships was crucial at different points of the social prescribing pathway, with patients needing to trust GPs in order for them to agree to see a link worker or attend a community activity, and GPs requiring a range of strong inter-personal skills in order to gain patients’ trust and motivate them. Conclusion This study elucidates the barriers and enablers to social prescribing for patients with mental health problems, from the perspectives of GPs. Recommended interventions include a more systematic feedback structure for GPs and more formal training around social prescribing and developing the relevant inter-personal skills. This study provides insight for GPs and other practice staff, commissioners, managers, providers and community groups, to help design and deliver future social prescribing services.

Physical activity through social prescribing: An interview‐based study of Danish general practitioners' opinions

“…The GPs found it challenging to keep up with all new activities and groups in their patients´ local community, which is consistent to the findings by Aughterson et al. (2020). According to the GPs in the study, PA‐counselling seems to lack specific referral advice on PA, which is in line with other studies that show that GPs need signposting opportunities (Carstairs et al., 2020; Jørgensen et al., 2012).…”

Primary care-based link workers providing social prescribing to improve health and social care outcomes for people with multimorbidity in socially deprived areas (the LinkMM trial): Pilot study for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

“…Qualitative evaluations of social prescribing programmes suggested that there is variation in the level of GP commitment and this can affect implementation. 29,30 Our follow up rate of 57% was lower than other trials, [9][10][11] but this could potentially be improved with reminders by post and phone.…”

Increased Wellbeing following Engagement in a Group Nature-Based Programme: The Green Gym Programme Delivered by the Conservation Volunteers

“…With the increased popularity in community-based or the social prescribing of nature-based activities, there is increased demand for services from the VCSE sector and, thus, a strain on funding and resources [ 47 ]. Financial and practical support are needed to ensure the effective delivery of activities and access for people from different socio-economic and ethnic groups [ 48 , 49 ]. Thus, evidence for the effectiveness of these types of programmes is essential.…”