1999
DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Predictors of Changes in Students' Achievement Goal Orientations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
254
4
35

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
15
254
4
35
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking at belongingness instead of merely social relations, in a one-year follow-up longitudinal study [9], fifth-grade students' school belongingness was found to relate to their achievement goal orientation. In a similar study, college students' social relations and attachment to the school were also found to relate to academic motivation [10].…”
Section: Social Relations Teacher's Support and Academic Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Looking at belongingness instead of merely social relations, in a one-year follow-up longitudinal study [9], fifth-grade students' school belongingness was found to relate to their achievement goal orientation. In a similar study, college students' social relations and attachment to the school were also found to relate to academic motivation [10].…”
Section: Social Relations Teacher's Support and Academic Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Grade 7 (12.7) Grade 8 (13.7) Grade 9 (14.7) Anderman and Anderman (1999) Questionnaires completed in schools in 1996 Probability estimations for occupation and education dipped in grade 9. Attainment of family goals reported as most probable, followed by education then occupation.…”
Section: Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many gender differences in adolescent goal content have been reported. Girls commonly report a greater number or greater importance of interpersonal goals/hopes (Anderman & Anderman, 1999;Chang et al, 2006;Kasser & Ryan, 1993;Kasser, Ryan, Zax & Sameroff, 1995;Lanz & Rosnati, 2002;Malmberg & Norrgård, 1999;Nurmi, 1994;Nurmi & Pulliainen, 1991;Nurmi et al, 1999), and fears (Knox et al, 2000;Nurmi, Poole & Seginer, 1995). Conversely, boys rate social status (Ander-man & Anderman, 1999), becoming successful (Nurmi et al, 1999) and financial aspirations as more important (Kasser & Ryan, 1993).…”
Section: Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study therefore, investigated the (i) effect of personalization of instruction on students" motivation to learn mathematics word problems and (ii) effect of gender on motivation to learn mathematics word problems. Gender was included as a variable of interest in the present study because of its importance in mathematics education world-wide and more importantly differential findings of gender in previous researches on motivation exist (Anderman & Anderman, 1999, Anderman & Midgley, 1997Eccles, Wigfield, Harold, & Blumenfeld, 1993;Jacobs, Lanza, Osgood, Eccles, & Wigfield , 2002;Seidman, Allen, Aber, Mitchell & Feinman, 1994;Watt, 2004;Wigfield, Eccles, Mac Iver, Reuman & Midgley, 1991). Boys may be more likely than girls to endorse personal ability goals (Anderman & Midgley, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%