Social Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22525-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany: The Constitution of the Social

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social insurance may therefore be seen to reward effort and maintain an appropriate level of inequality. However, where inequality and its supporting policies directly limit social mobility, undermine meritocracy and de-link talent from effort, inequalities may be regarded as inappropriate (Zacher, 2013). Despite a growing mandate for redistribution of opportunities and outcomes, moral arguments regarding inequality remain more equivocal than those framing poverty, and current expressions may only concede the need for active state responses in cases of extreme inequality (Bangura, 2011).…”
Section: Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social insurance may therefore be seen to reward effort and maintain an appropriate level of inequality. However, where inequality and its supporting policies directly limit social mobility, undermine meritocracy and de-link talent from effort, inequalities may be regarded as inappropriate (Zacher, 2013). Despite a growing mandate for redistribution of opportunities and outcomes, moral arguments regarding inequality remain more equivocal than those framing poverty, and current expressions may only concede the need for active state responses in cases of extreme inequality (Bangura, 2011).…”
Section: Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the UK, see Marshall (1950, 1981) and Pinker (1979; for the United States, see Janowitz (1976); for the Netherlands, see de Swaan (1988) andvan Kersbergen (1995); for Germany, see Nullmeier (2000), Zacher (2013), and Achinger (1979); and for social anthropology, see von Benda-Beckmann and von Benda-Beckmann (1994). 2.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thomas Humphrey Marshall (1950) analyses the rise of the idea and institutions of equality in the wake of state-building, focusing on social rights and their societal requisites, which includes a "welfare consciousness" among citizens and elites (Marshall 1981b: 89) and the formation of social professions. Although Marshall is the most frequently quoted theorist of the welfare state, it is 6 For the UK, see Marshall (1950Marshall ( , 1981a and Pinker (1979); for the United States, see Janowitz (1976) and Heclo (1995); for the Netherlands, de Swaan (1988) and van Kersbergen (1995); for Germany, Kaufmann (1991Kaufmann ( , 1997Kaufmann ( , 2013aKaufmann ( , 2012, Nullmeier (2000), Zacher (2013), and Achinger (1979Achinger ( , first published 1958; for India, see Singh (2015a, b); and for social anthropology and Southeast Asia, see von Benda-Beckmann and von Benda-Beckmann (1994). Lessenich (2003) and Béland and Petersen (2014) explore basic concepts of the welfare state and of social policy, respectively.…”
Section: Ideas: a Constructivist Sociology Of Knowledge Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%