2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00081-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social perception of male and female computer synthesized speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
54
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In regards to those sentences, speech files were generated by twoT TS systems (male voices)a nd recorded from one natural speaker (male). The natural speech sample wasr ecorded in an anechoic environment; he wasn ot ap rofessional speaker.T he decision to use am ale voice wasi nfluenced by aprevious study published in [29]. These tests proved that the message produced by the male synthetic voice was rated as more favourable (e.g.…”
Section: Speech Materialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In regards to those sentences, speech files were generated by twoT TS systems (male voices)a nd recorded from one natural speaker (male). The natural speech sample wasr ecorded in an anechoic environment; he wasn ot ap rofessional speaker.T he decision to use am ale voice wasi nfluenced by aprevious study published in [29]. These tests proved that the message produced by the male synthetic voice was rated as more favourable (e.g.…”
Section: Speech Materialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Virtual characters, embodied agents, and speech interfaces have been studied in numerous experiments to understand the impact digital interfaces have on persuasion. For instance, Zanbaka et al studied the role of gender and realism in the persuasiveness of a virtual cat agent [39]; Schulman and Bickmore studied the effect of fidelity to human conversation of an embodied agent to engage a user in a persuasive dialogue [35]; Stern et al studied the persuasiveness of synthetic speech versus human speech [37]; and Mullenix et al studied the effect of gender in voice-based interfaces on their degree of persuasion [24].…”
Section: Persuasion In User Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attitude change research aims at recording changes in attitude as an effect of exposure to a persuasive message. Following the ELM [33] and numerous studies that use ELM as the main theoretical framework of reference [39,35,37,24,21], we structured our experiment around the following steps: (1) Topic description: A brief and neutral description of the topic under discussion is provided to the participant; (2) Pre-treatment attitude: Attitude towards the topic under discussion is recorded before the participant is exposed to the persuasive message; (3) Persuasive message: The participant is presented with the persuasive message; (4) Post-treatment attitude: Attitude towards the topic under discussion is recorded again after the participant is exposed to the persuasive message. Attitude change is measured as the difference between the post-treatment and pre-treatment attitude.…”
Section: Topicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a comparative analysis of subjective dimensions between male and female voices, using ANOVA, indicated a significant difference for male listeners, where the male listeners rated QoE-MOS and Valence for male voices higher than female voices with F (1, 258) = 15.72; p ≤ 0.01 and F (1, 258) = 6.49; p ≤ 0.05, respectively. Previous research has found similar preference of male voices over female voices, for male listeners [57], and, male and female listeners [58].…”
Section: Subjective Data Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 58%