1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00299921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social organization of a free-ranging population of pine voles, Microtus pinetorum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
4

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to confirm whether a species exhibits only facultative monogamy or obligatory monogamy in nature, it is necessary to investigate the male's contribution to the rearing of offspring. Field and laboratory studies have suggested that monogamy might be the basic mating system in some rodents, such as Microtus californicus (Batzli et al 1977;Lidicker 1980;but see Ostfeld 1986), 34. pinetorum (Fitzgerald & Madison 1983) and 34. ochrogaster (Getz et al 1981;Getz & Hofmann 1986). Males of these monogamous species may have an important role in rearing offspring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to confirm whether a species exhibits only facultative monogamy or obligatory monogamy in nature, it is necessary to investigate the male's contribution to the rearing of offspring. Field and laboratory studies have suggested that monogamy might be the basic mating system in some rodents, such as Microtus californicus (Batzli et al 1977;Lidicker 1980;but see Ostfeld 1986), 34. pinetorum (Fitzgerald & Madison 1983) and 34. ochrogaster (Getz et al 1981;Getz & Hofmann 1986). Males of these monogamous species may have an important role in rearing offspring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this apparently cannot be generalized across all induced ovulators, or even across the genus Microtus, because sexual behavior in the biparental, monogamous, and induced-ovulating pine vole (Microtus pinetorum) (Fitzgerald and Madison, 1983;Oliveras and Novak, 1986;Sawrey and Dewsbury, 1985;Taylor, Salo, and Dewsbury, 1992) can be both masculinized and defeminized by even a brief neonatal testosterone treatment (a single 0.5-mg TP injection on day of birth) (Wekesa and Vandenbergh, 1996). Therefore, even within closely related species of Microtus there is a diverse array of hormonal mechanisms affecting sexual differentiation of reproductive behaviors, emphasizing the value of using Microtine rodents as a model for studying the effects of hormones on behavioral development in mammals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phylogenetic similarity, coupled with divergent life strategy, makes these rodents extremely valuable for comparative studies investigating social behavior. For example, prairie and pine voles (M. pinetorum) are highly affiliative ( Figure 1A), monogamous rodents that form enduring bonds after mating (FitzGerald et al, 1983;Getz et al, 1986;Carter et al, 1993). In both species, pair bonded males and females share a nest and home territory and both the mother and father participate in rearing offspring ( Figure 1B) (Wilson, 1982;FitzGerald et al, 1983;McGuire et al, 1984;Gruder-Adams et al, 1985;Getz et al, 1986;Oliveras et al, 1986;Carter et al, 1993).…”
Section: The Microtus Rodents For Comparative Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, prairie and pine voles (M. pinetorum) are highly affiliative ( Figure 1A), monogamous rodents that form enduring bonds after mating (FitzGerald et al, 1983;Getz et al, 1986;Carter et al, 1993). In both species, pair bonded males and females share a nest and home territory and both the mother and father participate in rearing offspring ( Figure 1B) (Wilson, 1982;FitzGerald et al, 1983;McGuire et al, 1984;Gruder-Adams et al, 1985;Getz et al, 1986;Oliveras et al, 1986;Carter et al, 1993). Alternatively, meadow (M. pennsylvanicus) and montane (M. montanus) voles are less social ( Figure 1A), promiscuous rodents that do not form pair bonds or share a nest after mating (Getz, 1972;Madison, 1978;Jannett, 1980;Madison, 1980;Jannett, 1982;Insel et al, 1995b;Young et al, 1998).…”
Section: The Microtus Rodents For Comparative Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%