Money at the Margins 2018
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw04bp0.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Networks of Mobile Money in Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobiles are commonly used to affirm the safety and well-being of friends and family within and between rural and urban areas (Porter et al 2015). Such uses reflect cultural practices of reciprocity whereby informal networks of kin, friends, and community members offer support, obligation, and belonging (Kusimba et al 2015). Research on the "collectivist" Kenyan social structure indicates in-groups offer social support in exchange for loyalty (Hofstede 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mobiles are commonly used to affirm the safety and well-being of friends and family within and between rural and urban areas (Porter et al 2015). Such uses reflect cultural practices of reciprocity whereby informal networks of kin, friends, and community members offer support, obligation, and belonging (Kusimba et al 2015). Research on the "collectivist" Kenyan social structure indicates in-groups offer social support in exchange for loyalty (Hofstede 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative work done in rural Kenya (2013Kenya ( -2015 found that mobile phones amplify existing inequality between marginalized populations and for-profit companies (e.g., telecom providers) and between rural and urban users (Wyche et al 2016). Finally, mixed-method social network analysis and ethnographic research done in Kenya's Bungoma andTrans-Nzoia counties (2012-2014) found that mobile money transfers reinforce preexisting social relationships and forms of emotional support, particularly for kinship relations (Kusimba, Yang, and Chawla 2015).…”
Section: Network and Communication Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, upon closer inspection of the ethnographic literature on the topic, this assumption proved wrong for the second indicator, in that even the poor at times make use of M-PESA to provide financial help to friends and relatives. In their analysis of twelve family networks, Kusimba, Yang, and Chawla [47] (p. 1) find that money transfers are "small and frequent" and that money networks are often reciprocal: "People were not only senders or receivers, but rather, participants in groups who circulate value-groups of siblings who pool resources for a father's medical needs . .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. or community members who contribute to funerals" [47] (p. 1). Therefore, we decided not to exclude respondents who send and receive, but only those who send but do not receive.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most users of mobile money service in western Kenya use it as a social and economic tool through which they create relationships by sending money as gifts. Such gifts could be either social gifting, assisting friends and relatives, organizing savings groups or contributing to ceremonies and funerals [15].…”
Section: Kenyamentioning
confidence: 99%