“…It differs, however, in that support is examined as a resource for individuals undergoing particular crises or stresses. For example, individual investigations have examined support (or closely related concepts) in physical and psychological adjustment to job loss (Cobb & Kasl, 1977;Gore, 1978), occupational stress (House,198 I), marital disruption (Wilcox,198 l), teenage pregnancy (Barrera, 198 l), childbirth (Sosa, Kennel, Klaus, Robertson, & Urrutia, 1980), widowhood (Maddison & Walker, 1967;Parkes, 1975;Pihlbad & Adams, 1972;Raphael, 1977;Vachon, 1979), stroke (Dzau & Boehme, 1978;Robertson & Suinn, 1968), hypertension (Caplan, Robinson, French, Caldwell, & Shinn, 1976;Earp, 1979), heart disease (Finlayson, 1976;Lynch, Thomas, Mills, Malinow, & Katche, 1974), and a variety of other acute, chronic, and life-threatening illnesses (Bunn & Clarke, 1979;Davidson, Bowden, & Tholen, 1979;De Aranjo, van Arsdel, Holmes, & Dudley, 1973;Litman, 1966;Porritt, 1979;Weisman & Worden, 1975). Most of these studies include tests of both the direct and the indirect (buffering) effects of support; but, unlike the first two traditions of research mentioned above, the samples are composed of subjects who have all undergone a common stressful experience.…”