2006
DOI: 10.1080/03085140500465899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social networks and the study of relations: networks as method, metaphor and form

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
182
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
182
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Human and non-human actors are continuously shaping and being shaped, meaning object and subject are entwined in mutual embrace (Knox et al, 2006;Strang, 2009;Harvey, 2011). The photovoltaic drive has reshaped the natural and social landscape of central Greece as raw materials change functionality and in turn redesign the livelihood of human agents.…”
Section: Theoretical Ponderings a Systems Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human and non-human actors are continuously shaping and being shaped, meaning object and subject are entwined in mutual embrace (Knox et al, 2006;Strang, 2009;Harvey, 2011). The photovoltaic drive has reshaped the natural and social landscape of central Greece as raw materials change functionality and in turn redesign the livelihood of human agents.…”
Section: Theoretical Ponderings a Systems Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This focus on ego-centric networks and individual action contrasts with formal network analysis, which takes a "whole network" approach focusing on the form and structure of social relations within a particular bounded population (Foster, 1978). Nevertheless, both approaches present a challenge to rational choice theories dominant in 6 American social sciences by looking at networks as at once enabling and constraining action, and human agency as reproductive and potentially transformative of entrenched social relations (Emirbayer & Goodwin, 1994;Knox et al, 2006). Network analysis within social anthropology was driven by a dissatisfaction with prevailing structuralist forms of explanation, as well as empirically by a need for new ways of understanding kinship in urban settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there would seem to be irreconcilable epistemological differences between the structuralist empiricism of quantitative, formal approaches using SNA and the post-structural constructivism of ANT and certain ethnographic approaches, which see networks as, in part, artefacts of the research process itself (Knox et al, 2006;Riles, 2001). Working within this tension between more formal, analytical approaches and more reflexive, ethnographic modes of network analysis, we argue that network analysis and visualization can be used as an iterative tool for qualitative research in human geography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advent of Social Network Analysis (SNA) in visualising relationships through mapping social interconnections (sociograms) has enabled a significant shift from loose metaphorical narratives on network relationships to more precise outputs on web of invisible ties among social actors (Knox et al, 2006). SNA can reveal interdependence between social actors and its consequences through employing SNA-specific measurements such as centrality, density and size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%