2021
DOI: 10.1177/2378023120985254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Networks and Loneliness During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: We utilize longitudinal social network data collected pre–COVID-19 in June 2019 and compare them with data collected in the midst of COVID in June 2020. We find significant decreases in network density and global network size following a period of profound social isolation. While there is an overall increase in loneliness during this era, certain social network characteristics of individuals are associated with smaller increases in loneliness. Specifically, we find that people with fewer than five “very close”… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
79
1
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(68 reference statements)
6
79
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As a relative comparison to another large-scale crisis, personal social networks were identified as the most important source providing psychological, financial, and social support after Hurricane Katrina (Forgette et al 2009), suggesting that declines in social confidants would have potent consequences for loneliness during the pandemic. This argument is supported by additional research conducted during the pandemic that has shown that people with low numbers of network confidants tended to report increases in loneliness (Kovacs et al 2021). By extension, the likely increasing importance of reliance on social support networks during the pandemic, paired with the losses of these very same support networks, could lead to notable increases in loneliness that in turn undermine self-rated health.…”
Section: Social Network Confidants During the Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As a relative comparison to another large-scale crisis, personal social networks were identified as the most important source providing psychological, financial, and social support after Hurricane Katrina (Forgette et al 2009), suggesting that declines in social confidants would have potent consequences for loneliness during the pandemic. This argument is supported by additional research conducted during the pandemic that has shown that people with low numbers of network confidants tended to report increases in loneliness (Kovacs et al 2021). By extension, the likely increasing importance of reliance on social support networks during the pandemic, paired with the losses of these very same support networks, could lead to notable increases in loneliness that in turn undermine self-rated health.…”
Section: Social Network Confidants During the Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One possible explanation for this finding is that individuals were not residing with their closest ties. For example, Kovac's et al, (2021) found individuals who reported fewer interactions with their “very close” close ties experienced more perceived social isolation during the 2020 lockdown in the United States. Fewer social interactions with close or quality relationships during COVID-19 may indicate that it is the “perceived” nature of social isolation that is a critical contributing factor to psychological distress compared to quantity of social contact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be taken into consideration that the prevalence of this situation is restricted to welfare states and urban regions in which alternatives for ageing in place and traditional family care are present and accessible. Moreover, if the results are placed within the perspective of the Covid19 epidemic, then it could be reckoned that social network changes due to social restriction measures will have increased, as well as the number of older adults that experience a negative impact, which was supported and nuanced by recent evidence on this subject [ 51 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%