Social Networks and Charitable Giving: Trusting, Doing, Asking, and Alter Primacy

Abstract

This study examines social networks and financial giving to charitable or religious causes. Conventional social capital measures of general social trust and size of social network are studied as predictors of charitable giving. To these traditional measures, we add an examination of particular network aspects of giving: ego giving in relation to network alters who give, solicitations to give by network ties, and ego soliciting alters to give. Additionally, the study disaggregates alter effects by alter position. Findings indicate that, net of social trust, social network factors significantly predict likelihood of being a giver. In particular, findings are that egos are especially likely to be donors when their primary alter donates. Three configurations of ego-alter giving and solicitations are significant predictors of ego giving, indicating that ego-alter doing matters more than asking. Theoretical contributions for relational and prosocial studies are discussed, as are practical implications for fundraising professionals.

Does Stakeholder Engagement Pay Off on Social Media? A Social Capital Perspective

“…Instead, social capital is valued insofar as it delivers some resource that can be leveraged in pursuit of some other valuable individual, organizational, or community outcomewhether a job or a promotion, organizational donations or client satisfaction, or community trust or engagement. There is a growing literature emphasizing this key mediating role of social capital in helping deliver a return on investment from websites (Lin, 1999), blogs (Baehr & Alex-Brown, 2010), and social media (Saxton & Guo, 2014;Herzog & Yang, 2018). Saxton & Guo (2015) and Guo & Saxton (2016) go even further in extending such arguments, explicitly positing social media-based social capital (which they refer to via the shorthand social media capital) as the proximate resource engendered by social media activities.…”

Disaster Relief as Social Action: A Weberian Look at Postdisaster Donation Behavior

“…People are more likely to give when individuals within their social networks give or ask for donations. That is, “it is exposure to givers, not necessarily solicitations or asking network members to give, that relates to greater odds of being a giver” (Herzog and Yang :388).…”

Getting Connected: An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Social Capital and Philanthropy Among Online Volunteers

“…A number of studies have sought to empirically investigate the relationship between social capital and philanthropy in offline settings, almost all of which make use of survey data and find that both the number and diversity of associational ties are significant predictors of individual levels of volunteering and/or charitable giving (Brown & Ferris, 2007;Dury et al, 2014;Herzog & Yang, 2018). The relationship has been shown to persist over time, with evidence from Hossain & Lamb (2017) showing that social capital built through membership of associations in youth and adulthood is a significant predictor of charitable giving among adults.…”