2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01399-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social networks` analysis of rural stakeholders in watershed management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important of these concepts is centrality, power, and grouping (Narayan et al, 2020;Fatemi et al, 2021). Graph theory and NetDraw software were used to plot the data (Scott, 2012).…”
Section: Sampling and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The most important of these concepts is centrality, power, and grouping (Narayan et al, 2020;Fatemi et al, 2021). Graph theory and NetDraw software were used to plot the data (Scott, 2012).…”
Section: Sampling and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grouping the actors of a network allows understanding of how an agent or organization behaves within a group, as well as the overall behavior of the network Leahy and Anderson (2008). Also, the identification of weak and strong sections within a network is provided by examining the number and severity of communications between and within the groups Fatemi et al (2021).…”
Section: Groupingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Community renewable energy (CRE) proposes the active involvement of communities in the shared ownership and/or management of RE (Seyfang et al, 2013;van der Schoor & Scholtens, 2019;Walker & Devine-Wright, 2008). Involving rural stakeholders in the comprehensive management of their natural resources is a powerful strategy (Fatemi et al, 2021). It can foster social acceptance of RE (Shi et al, 2016;Yildiz et al, 2015) and let the benefits from the projects leak into the communities where they are placed (Clausen & Rudolph, 2020;Mignon & Rüdinger, 2016;Okkonen & Lehtonen, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%