2019
DOI: 10.1037/neu0000564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social network characteristics and cognitive functioning in ethnically diverse older adults: The role of network size and composition.

Abstract: Objectives: Social engagement has been linked to preserved cognitive functioning in later life. While social engagement is often operationalized as social network size, social networks can vary not only in size, but also in composition. Previous work has found that having a greater proportion of family in a network is associated with worse socioemotional and cognitive outcomes compared to having a greater proportion of friends. In addition, social resources may differentially affect cognition in minority group… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior cross-sectional investigations have found that having a greater portion of family within one's social network is associated with lower cognition (Li & Dong, 2018;Sharifian et al, 2019). Furthermore, having a higher number of close friends, but not children or neighbors, has been linked to better global cognition (Wang, He, & Dong, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior cross-sectional investigations have found that having a greater portion of family within one's social network is associated with lower cognition (Li & Dong, 2018;Sharifian et al, 2019). Furthermore, having a higher number of close friends, but not children or neighbors, has been linked to better global cognition (Wang, He, & Dong, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consistent with the cognitive reserve theory (Stern, 2002), older adults that remain actively engaged within their social networks show slower rates of cognitive decline (Béland, Zunzunegui, Alvarado, Otero, & del Ser, 2005;Zahodne et al, 2019) and have lower Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) incidence (Amieva et al, 2010), suggestive that contact with social network members may act as a resource that promotes cognitive efficiency and compensatory processes. Recent evidence, however, suggests that relationship type matters (Sharifian, Manly, Brickman, & Zahodne, 2019;Zahodne et al, 2019). Specifically, the link between social engagement and cognition may vary dependent on whether the individual is spending time with friends or with family.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for a prospective association between the NIH Toolbox Friendship survey and slower episodic memory decline is consistent with the growing body of literature on social relations and cognitive aging. Indeed, recent cognitive aging studies that have parsed the multidimensional construct of social relations into its potential "active ingredients" have converged on the importance of friends for maintaining episodic memory (Haslam, Cruwys, & Haslam, 2014;Sharifian, Kraal, Zaheed, Sol, & Zahodne, 2020a,b;Sharifian, Manly, Brickman, & Zahodne, 2019;Zahodne, Ajrouch, Sharifian, & Antonucci, 2019). For example, ties to a social group are more strongly associated with preserved global cognition than ties to a series of individuals (i.e., pair-based ties) among older adults in England (Haslam, Cruwys, & Haslam, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Several distinct subtypes of functional support have been identified, including emotional, informational, tangible and affection support, as well as positive social interactions. 8 The association between structural support and cognitive function has been investigated more frequently [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] than that of functional support, but there is growing evidence for the importance of functional support [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] which may more accurately assess the level and perceived value of support available to an individual.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%