1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0740-8188(96)90003-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
409
0
32

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 723 publications
(463 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
409
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies nd that those who report weaker, more casual, friendships or work relationship s (e.g., acquaintance or coworker relationships ) engage in fewer, less intimate exchanges and share fewer types of information and support than those who report stronger relationships. More strongly tied pairs include in their exchanges a higher level of intimacy, more selfdisclosure, emotional as well as instrumental exchanges, reciprocity in exchanges, and more frequent interaction (Granovetter, 1982;Haythornthwaite, 1996;Marsden & Campbell, 1984;Walker et al, 1994;Wellman & Gulia, 1999;Wellman et al, 1988). Although some people maintain intimacy without frequent contact, these are primarily kinship relationships .…”
Section: The Nature Of Social Network Tiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies nd that those who report weaker, more casual, friendships or work relationship s (e.g., acquaintance or coworker relationships ) engage in fewer, less intimate exchanges and share fewer types of information and support than those who report stronger relationships. More strongly tied pairs include in their exchanges a higher level of intimacy, more selfdisclosure, emotional as well as instrumental exchanges, reciprocity in exchanges, and more frequent interaction (Granovetter, 1982;Haythornthwaite, 1996;Marsden & Campbell, 1984;Walker et al, 1994;Wellman & Gulia, 1999;Wellman et al, 1988). Although some people maintain intimacy without frequent contact, these are primarily kinship relationships .…”
Section: The Nature Of Social Network Tiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social network analysis has been applied in the learning domain to explore the exchange of knowledge or information [14], the effects of teacher presence on the density of a network [19], the cohesion of small groups (in order to identify active groups and isolated nodes) [23], and participation in collaborative learning activities [20].…”
Section: Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social network analysis enables examining how different attributes of network structures affect the resource exchange (Haythornthwaite, 1996). Since building insidership position is a way of accessing necessary market-related information and resources, SNA can help to reveal how different network structures affect the value of the insidership.…”
Section: Understanding Loo From Sna Lensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, when the uncertainty is high and there is less commonality between the environments of the insider and outsider -including institutional commonalities -it could be beneficial to build an insidership position into densely connected networks. Value of insidership positions can be better understood through revealing network structures and actor positioning which can be revealed with analytical techniques provided by SNA (Haythornthwaite, 1996). The SNA-related measurements given on Table 13.3 will be evaluated in the light of two phenomena: psychic distance and type of necessary knowledge.…”
Section: Understanding Loo From Sna Lensesmentioning
confidence: 99%