2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9002-4_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Movements and Social Inequality: Toward a More Balanced Assessment of the Relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet how can businesses be engaged as partners and advocates in a living wage campaign? From Piven and Cloward's (1979) classic book Poor People's Movements to recent research on the occupy movement (Castells, 2013;Grusky et al, 2013), scholars have sought to understand the dynamics of movements that seek to reduce inequality and shape policies to reduce poverty (Piven, 2006;Snow and Owens, 2013). Other research demonstrates that new social movements emerging in response to shifting power relations, such as the shift to neoliberal globalization, can be a powerful force in resisting the negative consequences of privatization and growing inequality by creating strong advocacy coalitions or institutions that reduce poverty (Bebbington, 2009;Chun, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet how can businesses be engaged as partners and advocates in a living wage campaign? From Piven and Cloward's (1979) classic book Poor People's Movements to recent research on the occupy movement (Castells, 2013;Grusky et al, 2013), scholars have sought to understand the dynamics of movements that seek to reduce inequality and shape policies to reduce poverty (Piven, 2006;Snow and Owens, 2013). Other research demonstrates that new social movements emerging in response to shifting power relations, such as the shift to neoliberal globalization, can be a powerful force in resisting the negative consequences of privatization and growing inequality by creating strong advocacy coalitions or institutions that reduce poverty (Bebbington, 2009;Chun, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Put simply, collective identity is a sense of “we-ness” shared among members of a group (Snow & McAdam, 2000; Snow & Owens, 2014). More than a static characteristic that group members share, collective identity emerges through a series of group performances and interactions (Snow & Corrigall-Brown, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than a static characteristic that group members share, collective identity emerges through a series of group performances and interactions (Snow & Corrigall-Brown, 2015). Group members establish and maintain a collective identity with identity work that unites members under common goals or motivations (Snow & McAdam, 2000; Snow & Owens, 2014), and relevant collective action gives group members a shared sense of agency (Polletta & Jasper, 2001; Snow & Corrigall-Brown, 2015). Through these behaviors, collective identity exists at both an individual level that each group member experiences and a group level that unites members as a singular entity (Berstein & Olsen, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent analyses show that the continuum relative deprivation-grievance-protest is complex and crossed by several media-tions. On the one hand, social movements put in place mechanisms and similar processes of social psychology in relation to inequality (Snow & Owens, 2014). On the other hand its the influence of different affective and cognitive components (Van Zomeren, Postmes & Spears, 2008) or of the individual and collective dimension (Smith & Pettigrew, 2015) of relative deprivation in collective action, as well as the links between different types of inequality and types of movements (Snow & Owens, 2014).…”
Section: Social Movements and Communicative Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, social movements put in place mechanisms and similar processes of social psychology in relation to inequality (Snow & Owens, 2014). On the other hand its the influence of different affective and cognitive components (Van Zomeren, Postmes & Spears, 2008) or of the individual and collective dimension (Smith & Pettigrew, 2015) of relative deprivation in collective action, as well as the links between different types of inequality and types of movements (Snow & Owens, 2014). Collective action is considered a form of visibility of interests and aspirations by the aggrieved groups, through their discourse demands and specific actions (Snow & Owens, 2014).…”
Section: Social Movements and Communicative Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%