2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9130-4_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Movements and Emotions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one just expresses its affection with capitals, for “THIS CITY.” This could also be linked to the “relocalisation” toward which political movements have been said to move, as a way to anchor itself into the material struggle and not getting lost through the deterritorialization of globalization of capital and politics (Askanius, 2010). Previous studies have also shown how “[a]ctivists sometimes draw on emotional connections to places created by other movements” (Jasper & Owens, 2014, p. 539). In this case, the interdiscursivity of emotionality already invested in the city (as with the supporter discourse) is drawn upon by the participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first one just expresses its affection with capitals, for “THIS CITY.” This could also be linked to the “relocalisation” toward which political movements have been said to move, as a way to anchor itself into the material struggle and not getting lost through the deterritorialization of globalization of capital and politics (Askanius, 2010). Previous studies have also shown how “[a]ctivists sometimes draw on emotional connections to places created by other movements” (Jasper & Owens, 2014, p. 539). In this case, the interdiscursivity of emotionality already invested in the city (as with the supporter discourse) is drawn upon by the participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political bodies have not, in general, been researched and understood in terms of their emotionality, and when they are, they are often seen as illegitimate, and their claims and concerns are seen as outrageous, utopian or their rage and hope individualized (Cammaerts, 2012; Persson, 2016). More recently, however, there has been an affective and emotional turn in the social sciences at large where emotionality of politics has generated new interest in a variety of different academic fields, not least among communication scholars (Bainbridge & Yates, 2014; Coleman, 2013; Dahlgren, 2009, 2013; Dahlgren & Alvares, 2013; Gould, 2010; Jasper & Owens, 2014; Pantti & Wahl-Jorgensen, 2011; Richards, 2007; Wahl-Jorgensen, 2012, 2016). If there is a normative idea guiding this article, it is the one put forward by Coleman when he argues that “[d]emocracy depends on forms of interruptive speaking, movement and place-taking that defy the almost all-encompassing image of the public as extras on the stage of history” (Coleman, 2013, p. 194).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach borrowed from the concept of frame introduced by Erving Goffman as 'schemata of interpretation' that allow individuals to 'locate, perceive, identify and label' experiences (1974: 21), making them meaningful. Scholars began to focus on agency and meaning, investigating them through the prism of emotions, identities, and framing processes (Benford, Snow 2000;Flesher Fominaya 2010;Jasper, Owens 2014). In this study, I analyse how activists frame corruption and their response to this issue considering what is referred to as the diagnostic and prognostic frame, i. e. the 'identification of a problem and attribution of blame or casualty <…> and the identification of strategies, tactics, and targets' (Snow, Benford 1988: 200-201).…”
Section: Proposing a Different Theoretical Approach To Investigate Anti-corruption In Russiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But what makes his analysis distinctive is that often these pressures cannot be resolved because institutional systems—for example, economy, polity, law, religion—reveal rigidities that keep them from innovating new solutions to problems of inequality (although the historical record, thus far, shows that these institutional systems were able to innovate more than Marx anticipated). As a result, those who are subordinate or marginalized and who do not perceive that they receive a fair share of resources will experience a variety of deprivations that accumulate into a set of grievances that, initially, are only vaguely articulated but that, nonetheless, arouse intense negative emotions (Goodwin and Jasper 2006; Jasper and Owens 2014; Turner 2010). The conflict process begins here, and under a number of conditions, leads subordinates to develop counterideologies against not only the legitimating ideologies of the political economy but also the institutional structure of a society (Summers-Effler and Kwak 2015; Turner 2010).…”
Section: Types Of Natural Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%