Social Movement Studies for East Central Europe? The Challenge of a Time-Space Bias on Postwar Western Societies

Abstract

1The paper claims that through its genealogy, Social Movement Studies (SMS) as a discipline incorporated a time-space bias on postwar Western affluent societies which defined the way it conceived of movements and their socio-institutional contexts. Two interrelated effects of that bias were the assumption that material claims belong to the past, and a focus on short-term contextual factors in movement dynamics. As a new wave of movements after 2008 raise material claims in Western contexts again, earlier frameworks of SMS are being transformed so as to capture the relationship of movements to long-term structural processes. However, a newly forming consensus that links new movements to the "crisis of democratic capitalism" seems to maintain the bias on Western experience. East Central European (ECE) countries, where austerity and democratization came hand in hand after 1990, hardly fit that picture. The paper asks whether new transformations within SMS, and an increased attention toward ECE movements due to their new proliferation provides a possibility for comparative perspectives beyond the time-space bias. It identifies a tendency in SMS of post-socialism to translate the timespace bias of SMS frameworks into a normative framework of development toward Western models (or lack thereof), which worked to obscure the long-term history of movements in ECE, as well as forms of popular politics and state-society relations different from Western models. The paper proposes a world-systems approach to the task of comparative understanding of movements in different contexts, and illustrates its possible gains through the conceptualization of new middle class movements in ECE.

A „középosztály” eszménye és a köztes-közvetítő osztályok : Osztályhelyzetek és mozgósító ideálok a félperifériás magyar társadalomban

“…10 A rendszerváltás nagyrészt azonban mégis a reformértelmiség átmeneti osztályának sikerét hozta el. 11 Ebben kulcsszerepet játszott a "későkádári technokrácia" (Szalai Erzsébet fogalma), az államszocializmus neoliberális reformjára törekvő közgazdász-értelmiségi osztályfrakció, 8 Erről részletesebben : Gagyi 2014c: Gagyi , 2015b: Gagyi , 2016: Gagyi , 2017a: Gagyi , 2017b: Gagyi , 2018a: Gagyi , 2018b: Gagyi , 2018cÉber 2018. 9 Az állam részletesebb meghatározásához, jellemzéséhez, kialakulásának és struktúrájának elemzéséhez : Therborn 1978;Bourdieu 2000Bourdieu [19922002]: 85-115.…”

“… Részletesebben: Arrighi 2014;Janos 2003Janos [2000;Gagyi 2015aGagyi , 2015bGagyi , 2018bGagyi , 2018c …”

Producing the nation through philanthropy: Legitimising coethnic and prorefugee civic action in Hungary

“…As an exception, the study of social movements involving East‐Central Europe has taken an epistemological stance towards giving and volunteering and has also problematised meaning construction processes such as identity building and collective categorisations (while sharing the normative‐philosophical background of the civil society paradigm). However, due to its normative assumptions, it has only favoured phenomena that are easily matched with universalist models of democratisation while dismissing others, among them philanthropic giving and volunteering that are framed in national terms (Gagyi, 2015; Molnár, 2016).…”

Setkávání na okrajových scénách Průsečíky politického a subkulturního radikalismu v polistopadovém Česku

“…Jak zdůraznila Agnes Gagyi (2015), protestní hnutí ve východní a střední Evropě mají značná specifika a nelze je zkoumat mechanickým přenosem konceptů ze západní Evropy. Jedním z těchto specifik, jak konstatuje Grzegorz Piotrowski (2015), je i významná role subkultur (srv.…”