2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social models in the cognitive appraisal of self-efficacy information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
45
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the interviews, democratic students said that their parents do not have any science specific or achievements expectations from them. These findings are in line with results of previous studies (e.g., Ahn et al, ; Bouchey & Harter, ; Butz & Usher, ) but refine the distinction between the influence of different types of messages parents convey to their children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the interviews, democratic students said that their parents do not have any science specific or achievements expectations from them. These findings are in line with results of previous studies (e.g., Ahn et al, ; Bouchey & Harter, ; Butz & Usher, ) but refine the distinction between the influence of different types of messages parents convey to their children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Studies have shown that SE is influenced by what others, such as teachers, parents, and friends say (e.g., Ahn, Bong, & Kim, ; Butz & Usher, ) about one's competence. Bouchey and Harter () showed that SE is influenced by what one perceives others as thinking regarding one's competence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social persuasion scale was also composed of three subscales: Social persuasion by family (four items; e.g., ‘My family tells me that I can do well in math’), social persuasion by teacher (four items; e.g., ‘My teacher tells me that I can do well in math’), and social persuasion by peers (four items; e.g., ‘My friends tell me that I can do well in math’). The reliability coefficients for these scales ranged between .77 and .89 in the previous validation study (Ahn et al ., ). We excluded one item from the vicarious experience from family scale (‘I have a family member who has a math‐related career’) due to a reliability concern.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The vicarious experience and social persuasion scales validated in a previous study (Ahn, Bong, & Kim, ) were used. The vicarious experience scale consists of three subscales: Vicarious experience from family (three items; e.g., ‘I have a family member who is really good at math’), vicarious experience from teacher (four items; e.g., ‘My math teacher is really good at math’), and vicarious experience from peers (six items; e.g., ‘I have a friend who is really good at math’).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the provision of information and job skills training for individuals with special needs could lead them to feel like their disabilities are a barrier to achieving their desired career (perceived career barrier) [8]. Social support is needed to help individuals with special needs build the confidence to accomplish tasks [9]. Social support derived from figures such as family members, friends, teachers and community members could help the career development of individuals with sensory and motor impairment [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%