Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/pha3j
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social microclimates and well-being

Abstract: The transition to college is a challenging time during which many students suffer declines in well-being. Social connections play a key role in supporting mental health, but only tell part of the story of social life on campus. For instance, the personalities of one’s friends and neighbors on campus contribute to a “social microclimate.” Here, we quantify the collective impact of individual, social network, and community factors in the well-being of a first-year college cohort during (i) their first academic t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, participants were asked to nominate between two and five unique individuals in response to the following eight questions: (a) “Who in your residential college are your closest friends?” (b) “Who in your residential college do you spend the most time with?” (c) “Who in your residential college have you asked for advice about your social life?” (d) “Who do you turn to in your residential college when something bad happens?” (e) “Who in your residential college do you share good news with?” (f) “Who in your residential college makes you feel supported and cared for?” (g) “Who in your residential college is most empathetic?” And (h) “Who in your residential college usually makes you feel positive?” Following a similar method from Courtney et al (2021), we combined the unique nominations made across all subnetworks (represented by the eight questions above) to create a single, aggregate network per participant. The total number of unique support ties identified by the participant (i.e., network outdegree) served as a global measure of perceived social support (Courtney et al, 2021). In addition to this aggregate network measure, we also included nominations from individual subnetworks to compare, where relevant, all associations of interest using the aggregate measure versus subnetworks that may more directly index social support (e.g., “Who in your residential college makes you feel supported and cared for?”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, participants were asked to nominate between two and five unique individuals in response to the following eight questions: (a) “Who in your residential college are your closest friends?” (b) “Who in your residential college do you spend the most time with?” (c) “Who in your residential college have you asked for advice about your social life?” (d) “Who do you turn to in your residential college when something bad happens?” (e) “Who in your residential college do you share good news with?” (f) “Who in your residential college makes you feel supported and cared for?” (g) “Who in your residential college is most empathetic?” And (h) “Who in your residential college usually makes you feel positive?” Following a similar method from Courtney et al (2021), we combined the unique nominations made across all subnetworks (represented by the eight questions above) to create a single, aggregate network per participant. The total number of unique support ties identified by the participant (i.e., network outdegree) served as a global measure of perceived social support (Courtney et al, 2021). In addition to this aggregate network measure, we also included nominations from individual subnetworks to compare, where relevant, all associations of interest using the aggregate measure versus subnetworks that may more directly index social support (e.g., “Who in your residential college makes you feel supported and cared for?”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And (h) "Who in your residential college usually makes you feel positive?" Following a similar method from Courtney et al (2021), we combined the unique nominations made across all subnetworks (represented by the eight questions above) to create a single, aggregate network per participant. The total number of unique support ties identified by the participant (i.e., network outdegree) served as a global measure of perceived social support (Courtney et al, 2021).…”
Section: Measures and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study was not preregistered. The data and code for the analyses presented here are available on the Open Science Framework at https://doi.org/.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GYZJK (Courtney et al, 2021). Because raw network nomination data are potentially identifiable, reduced and preprocessed participant-level data are provided.…”
Section: Transparency and Opennessmentioning
confidence: 99%