2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media revenge: A typology of online consumer revenge

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the Internet and its platforms, consumers can use a variety of ways to get back at a misbehaving firm, such as status updates, tweets, spamming a company's page with angry messages, creating anticonsumption groups and websites, and hacking (Obeidat et al, 2017). Compared with offline revenge behaviors, online revenge behaviors can generate more publicity due to the perception of their greater reach, control, and risklessness (Obeidat et al, 2018;Tripp & Grégoire, 2011). Recent surveys show that 21 percent of young consumers use online platforms to complain after a service failure and 85 percent actually get revenge (Grant 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Over the Internet and its platforms, consumers can use a variety of ways to get back at a misbehaving firm, such as status updates, tweets, spamming a company's page with angry messages, creating anticonsumption groups and websites, and hacking (Obeidat et al, 2017). Compared with offline revenge behaviors, online revenge behaviors can generate more publicity due to the perception of their greater reach, control, and risklessness (Obeidat et al, 2018;Tripp & Grégoire, 2011). Recent surveys show that 21 percent of young consumers use online platforms to complain after a service failure and 85 percent actually get revenge (Grant 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extant literature on consumer revenge behavior has generally focused either on identifying the forms of revenge behavior in the offline and online context (e.g., Obeidat et al, 2018;Funches et al, 2009), or on the antecedents of consumer revenge behavior (e.g., Grégoire et al, 2010;Grégoire & Fisher, 2008;Bougie et al, 2003) using either a justice theory or cognitive appraisal justifications (e.g., Obeidat et al, 2017;Joireman et al, 2013). Moreover, there is an emerging but limited research that highlights the changes in social and economic conditions, as well as the global expansion and consumer communication technology in collectivist Eastern countries such as China and Jordan, where consumer revenge activities have noticeably increased (Obeidat et al, 2018;Obeidat et al, 2017). However, we know little about the online revenge process and consumers' interaction with social media in Eastern cultures (Hossain et al, 2018;Arora et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations