2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media-related tensions on business-to-business markets – Evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, we answer previous calls to conduct more research in the engagement-social media domain (Cortez and Dastidar, 2022). Consistent with recent studies (Luo et al, 2021), buyers display monitoring behaviors instead of active engagement, particularly on public social networks, due to privacy reasons and a lack of organizational guidelines.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, we answer previous calls to conduct more research in the engagement-social media domain (Cortez and Dastidar, 2022). Consistent with recent studies (Luo et al, 2021), buyers display monitoring behaviors instead of active engagement, particularly on public social networks, due to privacy reasons and a lack of organizational guidelines.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…B2B supplier’s posts on social media also trigger customers’ engagement behaviors such as liking, commenting, sharing and so forth (Cortez and Dastidar, 2022). Yet, tensions may exist: while suppliers praise the benefits of social media in increasing customer engagement and transparency, B2B customers show a passive attitude toward social media and an overall intention to remain “invisible” (Luo et al , 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We highlight that informative interactions gain cognitive and moral legitimacy, whereas customers' selectivity in affective and social interactions leads to social comparison and a sense of opportunism risks, thus eroding observers' trust. Finally, departing from the previous studies highlighting customers' distrust in suppliers during SM use (Banerjee et al, 2020), we extend the understanding of B2B SM dark-side literature (Chowdhury et al, 2016;Luo et al, 2021) by taking observer suppliers' lens to explore and unpack factors that erode their cognitive and affective trust, ultimately leading to negative behavioral outcomespassive resistance and unethical behaviors.…”
Section: B2b Social Media Usementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Kaur and Guptas’ (2022) literature review explores some of the more negative aspects of SM advancing our understanding of misinformation on SM platforms. Yet, there is room for future studies exploring other aspects of the darker side of SM in B2B interaction (Luo et al , 2021) in, for example, value co-creation (Chowdhury et al , 2016). As Web 3.0 technologies are being increasingly adopted by B2B practitioners, understanding how SM interacts with these novel digital platforms in industrial marketing is pertinent.…”
Section: Future Research Directions: a Call For Continued Research On...mentioning
confidence: 99%