Social Media, (Mis)information, and Voting Decisions

Mukherjee, Prithvijit; Pascarella, John Antonio; Rentschler, Lucas; Simmons, Randy T.

doi:10.1007/s11109-023-09884-9

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Beyond the matter of scale, however, is a shared concern across a range of research that false information – it can be demonstrated as false by using recognisable evidence – is functioning in a way that is dangerous to democratic political systems because it is being treated by significant numbers of people as though it is true. Some of the literature is concerned with the conditions under which information is believed (Mukherjee, et al 2023; Pantazi, Hale and Klein, 2021), the different reasons why people are prone to believe false news stories (Allcott and Gentzkow, 2017; van Prooijen, et al 2022), the role of echo chambers (Flaxman, Goel, and Rao 2016), and how to encourage readers to be more discerning in what they view to be reliable (Freeze, et al 2021). The research shares the view that there is something nefarious in how this type of false information functions within democratic politics.…”

Section: Part 1: ‘Correct Information’ and Politicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Threat of Fake News: Facts, Opinions, and Judgement

Baron,

Ish-Shalom

2024

Political Research Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article explores how fake news, variously described as misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, and post-truth threatens our pluralistic democratic life. We ask, how does fake news function in constructing a world of meaning that destabilises the conditions under which we are able to render valid political judgements in democratic life? Using the 1992 R v Zundel Supreme Court Case from Canada to explore the free speech question, and Hannah Arendt’s distinction between fact and opinion, we argue that fake news uses the malleability of language to displace fact with opinion. This displacement threatens democracy in two ways. First, fake news functions by deploying language in such a way that it is built on refuting its own ability to produce factual knowledge, and in the process the world becomes one of opinion treated axiomatically. Second, as a consequence, it renders judgement impossible because the only information that counts is opinion, whereas judgement corresponds to the public character of factual knowledge. This displacement produces a pseudo-reality where we can imagine that only people like us live here, that is, people who share our own opinions. This is a world that Hannah Arendt and Hans Jonas might characterise as thoughtless.

show abstract