2022
DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media information dissemination and corporate bad news hoarding

Abstract: According to Jin and Myers's (2006) agency theory, stock price crash risk is mainly caused by management opportunism and information asymmetry, where management has a self-interest motivation to withhold bad news from the company. When the accumulation of bad news has been eventually released to investors, it brings an unbearable negative impact to the company, which leads to the crash of the stock price. Therefore, mitigating management self-interest issues and alleviating information asymmetry to reduce bad … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a whole, this analysis highlights the complex effects of post-COVID-19 technical developments on different markets, with a range of results from improved predictability to changes in investor behavior and efficient markets. The bulk of market results are consistent with the hypothesis of data overload, which holds that investors would act irrationally even when they have access to all relevant information (He et al, 2023;Jansen et al, 2020;Kirchler et al, 2005;Li et al, 2019;Rasheed, Ali, & Khan, 2023;Shiller, 1995;Yuan, 2022). In addition, the Wald test's results indicate that stock market forecasting exists independent of information availability and technical improvements.…”
Section: Cafrsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a whole, this analysis highlights the complex effects of post-COVID-19 technical developments on different markets, with a range of results from improved predictability to changes in investor behavior and efficient markets. The bulk of market results are consistent with the hypothesis of data overload, which holds that investors would act irrationally even when they have access to all relevant information (He et al, 2023;Jansen et al, 2020;Kirchler et al, 2005;Li et al, 2019;Rasheed, Ali, & Khan, 2023;Shiller, 1995;Yuan, 2022). In addition, the Wald test's results indicate that stock market forecasting exists independent of information availability and technical improvements.…”
Section: Cafrsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…According to the traditional literature, this idea is called into question by the existence of market frictions that prevent investors from acquiring entire information. Despite significant developments in technology to reduce information asymmetry, information overload and hoarding are still a worry among traditionalist (Bernales, Valenzuela, & Zer, 2022;He, Feng, & Feng, 2023;Jansen, Nikiforov, & Lee, 2020). According to an alternative viewpoint, this return predictability or deviation is attributed to shifts in risk variables linked to stock prices and economic risk premiums (Conrad & Kaul, 1988;Fama & French, 1988;Xue & Zhang, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%