2021
DOI: 10.1111/medu.14567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social media in undergraduate medical education: A systematic review

Abstract: Introduction There are over 3.81 billion worldwide active social media (SoMe) users. SoMe are ubiquitous in medical education, with roles across undergraduate programmes, including professionalism, blended learning, well being and mentoring. Previous systematic reviews took place before recent explosions in SoMe popularity and revealed a paucity of high‐quality empirical studies assessing its effectiveness in medical education. This review aimed to synthesise evidence regarding SoMe interventions in undergradu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
1
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
(431 reference statements)
0
35
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, Reed et al reported a mean score of 9.95 ± 2.34 on 213 published and peer-reviewed general education studies, which could be considered the medium quality score [ 21 ]. After analysis of the quality of our included articles, we found a mean score of 11.7 ± 2.6, which is higher than those of Reed et al [ 21 ], but also much higher than previous findings on social media and education, with mean scores from 8.8 ± 3.3 to 9.5 ± 2.0 [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. These differences are certainly due to the high specificity of our selection criteria that allowed us to assess only comparative studies of several learning methods, with high quality methodology for the most part, even if we included two studies with lower scores of 8 and 8.5 [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Previously, Reed et al reported a mean score of 9.95 ± 2.34 on 213 published and peer-reviewed general education studies, which could be considered the medium quality score [ 21 ]. After analysis of the quality of our included articles, we found a mean score of 11.7 ± 2.6, which is higher than those of Reed et al [ 21 ], but also much higher than previous findings on social media and education, with mean scores from 8.8 ± 3.3 to 9.5 ± 2.0 [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. These differences are certainly due to the high specificity of our selection criteria that allowed us to assess only comparative studies of several learning methods, with high quality methodology for the most part, even if we included two studies with lower scores of 8 and 8.5 [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Existen reportes de uso de varias plataformas de redes sociales, así como de numerosos y variados instrumentos digitales dentro de la educación médica de pregrado, dentro de los planes de estudio de educación médica de pregrado (8) , relacionados al profesionalismo en línea (9) , el aprendizaje blended (10) (que combina horas presenciales y virtuales en una misma asignatura), el bienestar de los estudiantes (11) y la mentoría (12) que representan una fracción de todas las aplicaciones de las redes sociales en el pregrado de Medicina.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…El argumento para la integración de las redes sociales en la práctica educativa está respaldado por múltiples puntos de vista teóricos (8) . Como educadores, ya no se trata de saber si las redes sociales tienen aplicaciones educativas o si las poblaciones de estudiantes universitarios están utilizando activamente estas plataformas para su aprendizaje.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations