“…From a theoretical point of view, the study touches upon and contributes to deepening various aspects of the literature on the relationship between TAs and SM. Six different study perspectives can be identified: (1) usage of SM by SMEs (Matarazzo et al, 2021), in particular with respect to micro-enterprises (Vatanasakdakul et al, 2020: Jones et al, 2015; (2) SM adoption in the tourism industry (Magno and Cassia, 2018;Leung et al, 2019) with reference to TAs, focusing on the importance of social tools for the purpose of achieving marketing objectives; (3) omnichannel strategies in the retail sector (Capriello and Riboldazzi, 2020) implemented by tourism intermediaries in order to ensure a relationship with the client throughout the entire customer journey and achieved by setting up a multiplicity of contact moments, considering the different levels of the digital orientation of businesses and consumers; (4) rule of the pandemic on technology use among tourist enterprises Social media in travel agencies (Sigala, 2020), also in line with recent studies (Hu et al, 2023), where the pandemic seems to have accelerated the digitization process of those who had already undertaken it and, at the same time, induced the most reticent and traditional ones to start it; (5) factors that influence the SM adoption by SMEs and TAs (Ali Abbasi et al, 2022;Ali Qalati et al, 2022;Dahnil et al, 2014). The empirical analysis confirms that in small businesses the personal factors of the owner/manager are more discriminating than firm-specific ones, because the micro/small dimensions of TAs are characterized by a typically entrepreneurial approach to marketing (Morris et al, 2002) particularly suited to an informal organization, structured with few or no hierarchical levels, and strongly projected toward customer needs; and (6) factors that influence the adoption of specific social networks (Facebook, WhatsApp, etc.…”