Social Media for Political Campaigns: An Examination of Trump’s and Clinton’s Frame Building and Its Effect on Audience Engagement

Abstract

This study investigates cross-platform differences in social media by analyzing the contending candidates who represent different political ideology during the 2016 presidential election. Borrowing the frame-building and frame-effect perspectives, it examines the ways in which the two contending candidates (Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton) built their message frames in two different social platforms-Twitter (N = 3,805) and Facebook (N = 655)-and how the frame differences affected audience engagement in each platform. The results showed that Trump's messages presented more variety in frame selection than Clinton's, focusing on conflict and negative emotional frames on Twitter while displaying frequent positive emotional frames on Facebook. Clinton's strategy relied heavily on conflict and positive emotional frames on both Twitter and Facebook. The results also suggested that for both Trump and Clinton followers on Twitter, conflict and morality frames consistently attracted retweeting behaviors and emotional frames attracted favoriting behaviors. However, Facebook engagement behaviors did not show a consistent pattern between the followers of the two candidates.

The “Parallel Pandemic” in the Context of China: The Spread of Rumors and Rumor-Corrections During COVID-19 in Chinese Social Media

“…Prior research has confirmed emotion and rationality as twin engines of persuasion and responsiveness in online communication (X. Liu et al, 2019;Sahly et al, 2019). Emotional appeals are arousal-inducing features, which can increase social transmission of information (Berger, 2011).…”

Following Politicians on Social Media: Effects for Political Information, Peer Communication, and Youth Engagement

“…Investigations into the effects of engagement with, and exposure to, politicians' profiles for citizens remain scarce, with notable exceptions. Studies demonstrate that politicians' communication on social media can affect perceptions of a political actor's authenticity (Enli & Rosenberg, 2018;Kreiss et al, 2018) and audience engagement (e.g., Sahly et al, 2019). Kristensen et al (2017) find that voting intention can be linked to citizens 'liking' the representations of politicians on social media.…”

Mobilizing Consensus on Facebook: Networked Framing of the U.S. Gun-Control Movement on Facebook

“…Meanwhile, the digital environment adds in the ever-expanding role of online publics [26,27] who organically share a variety of information and conversations that intermixes news coverage, activist messages, memes, catchphrases, emotions, and both pro-and counter-protest opinions [27,28]. This is known as the process of "networked framing.…”